BEGIN:VCALENDAR
PRODID:-//Grails iCalendar plugin//NONSGML Grails iCalendar plugin//EN
VERSION:2.0
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20260606T021820Z
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Amsterdam:20221208T130000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Amsterdam:20221209T170000
SUMMARY:Debunking Inefficacy Reasoning
UID:20260610T155743Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-bd7db559-gt5qm
TZID:Europe/Amsterdam
LOCATION:Amsterdam\, Netherlands
DESCRIPTION:<p><strong>Call for Registration: Workshop&nbsp\;</strong><strong>&ldquo\;</strong><strong>Debunking Inefficacy Reasoning&rdquo\;</strong></p>\n<p><strong><br></strong> <strong>When: December 8 (13-17h) and December 9 (10-17h)</strong> <strong>Where: Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam</strong> <strong><br></strong> <u>Invitation:</u> We invite anyone who is interested in the theme of the workshop&nbsp\;to participate. To register\, please send an email to&nbsp\;<strong><a href="mailto:mullins@esphil.eur.nl">mullins@esphil.eur.nl</a></strong>.&nbsp\;Please note\, this workshop will be&nbsp\;<strong>in-person only.</strong> <strong><br></strong> <u>Theme:</u></p>\n<p>To successfully avert a climate crisis\, governments\, scientists and big corporations have to cooperate. However\, we tend to believe that citizens have to do their part as well: climate change can only be mitigated if people collectively change their behaviour to reduce their carbon emissions. Similarly\, such collective efforts are required in solving many other societal problems\, such as fighting a pandemic or raising money for charity (etc.)</p>\n<p>However\, since each individual contribution to the collective carbon footprint is extremely small\, individuals face the Inefficacy Problem:&nbsp\;&ldquo\;why should&nbsp\;<em>I</em>&nbsp\;cooperate\, if my contribution makes no difference? It seems to be a waste of my efforts!&rdquo\; Can we adequately debunk reasoning of this sort and\, instead\, find reasons to cooperate&nbsp\;<em>in spite of</em>&nbsp\;the inefficacy problem? This question will be the focus of the workshop.</p>\n<p><u>Speakers:</u></p>\n<p>- Keynote:&nbsp\;Felix Pinkert (Vienna)\, TBA<br>-&nbsp\;Andrea Asker Svedberg (Stockholm): &ldquo\;The Problem of Collective Impact. Why Helping Doesn&rsquo\;t Do the Trick&rdquo\;<br>-&nbsp\;Mattias Gunnemyr (Lund): &ldquo\;Reasons for Action. Making a Difference to the Security of Outcomes&rdquo\;<br>-&nbsp\;Rutger van Oeveren (Austin): &ldquo\;Participation and Causation&rdquo\;<br>-&nbsp\;Dmitry Ananiev (London): &ldquo\;Kantian Imperfect Duties and Cases of Collective Harm&rdquo\;<br>-&nbsp\;Luke Elson (Reading): &ldquo\;Inefficacy and Democracy&rdquo\;<br>-&nbsp\;Benjamin Mullins (Rotterdam): &ldquo\;Act Consequentialism and Imperceptible Difference Cases&rdquo\;<br>-&nbsp\;Tessa Sup&egrave\;r (Amsterdam): &ldquo\;Expressive Value and Precommitment&rdquo\;<br>-&nbsp\;Jan-Willem Wieland (Amsterdam): &ldquo\;What Problem?&rdquo\;</p>\n<p><u>This workshop is a collaboration between</u>:</p>\n<p>Ethics and Political Philosophy\, VU Amsterdam (Research project:&nbsp\;&ldquo\;The Ethics of Cooperation&rdquo\;)<br><a href="https://research.vu.nl/en/organisations/moral-and-political-philosophy/persons/">https://research.vu.nl/en/organisations/moral-and-political-philosophy/persons/<br></a><a href="https://vu.nl/en/about-vu/more-about/ethics-of-cooperation-sdg">https://vu.nl/en/about-vu/more-about/ethics-of-cooperation-sdg</a></p>\n<p>Erasmus Institute for Philosophy and Economics\, EUR (Research project:&nbsp\;&ldquo\;How Much is Enough?&rdquo\;)<br><a href="https://www.eur.nl/esphil/eipe">https://www.eur.nl/esphil/eipe<br></a><a href="https://www.eur.nl/esphil/onderzoek/onderzoeksthemas-en-projecten/how-much-enough">https://www.eur.nl/esphil/onderzoek/onderzoeksthemas-en-projecten/how-much-enough</a></p>
ORGANIZER:
METHOD:PUBLISH
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR
