BEGIN:VCALENDAR
PRODID:-//Grails iCalendar plugin//NONSGML Grails iCalendar plugin//EN
VERSION:2.0
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20260415T021150Z
DTSTART;TZID=Asia/Shanghai:20220906T160000
DTEND;TZID=Asia/Shanghai:20220906T190000
SUMMARY:Is Belief Weak in Chinese?
UID:20260415T073735Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-f5d4878dd-x5n6c
TZID:Asia/Shanghai
LOCATION:Hangzhou\, China\, 310058
DESCRIPTION:<p><strong>Abstract:</strong>&nbsp\;Recently there has been an heated debate about whether belief is weak. Roughly\, we can say that belief is weak if the evidential support it requires for being warranted is lower than that required by assertion or knowledge. Most discussions on this issue are based on linguistic considerations about the English verb 'believe' and related verbs expressing doxastic attitudes. This paper aims to explore whether corresponding belief-ascriptions in Chinese are weak. I apply some of the tests in Hawthorne\, Rothschild\, and Spectre (&ldquo\;HRS&rdquo\;) to Chinese verbs expressing doxastic attitudes. I argue that some such verbs are just as weak as the English verb &lsquo\;believe&rsquo\;. Other verbs express much stronger doxastic attitudes\, but the evidential support that warrant the corresponding attitudes seems still lower than that required by assertion or knowledge.</p>
ORGANIZER;CN=Jie Gao;CN=Davide Fassio:
METHOD:PUBLISH
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR
