\n
Contemporary European societies have been recently characterized as having entered the age of &lsquo\;super-diversity&rsquo\;. Migratory flows in particular have contributed to this transformation\, due to the heterogeneous ethno-cultural\, and religious background of present migrants\, as well as their social status\, age\, and mobility patterns. Among the effects this transformation has brought about is the increased challenge posed to the constitutive principle of the nation-state\, i.e.\, the assumption that identity (nation) and politics (state) can and should be mutually constituent and spatially congruent. Thus\, unsurprisingly\, many states have started perceiving diversity as a &lsquo\;problem&rsquo\;\, potentially threatening national unity\, while anti-immigration and xenophobic attitudes have experienced a rapid surge.
\n\nExisting scholarship has offered insightful critical analyses of this &lsquo\;backlash against diversity&rsquo\;\, documenting the rise of repressive state measures designed to limit access of new migrants to the national territory and citizenship. Other scholars have instead moved away from the idea of the nation-state\, proposing either post-national solutions\, which decouple the cultural (nation) from the political (state)\, or transnational paradigms\, which implicitly discard the focus on the nation-state as not only obsolete but also politically questionable. Yet\, despite important insights from this scholarship\, social and political life continues to remain largely structured by discourses\, resources and institutions articulated at the national scale.
\n