BEGIN:VCALENDAR
PRODID:-//Grails iCalendar plugin//NONSGML Grails iCalendar plugin//EN
VERSION:2.0
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20260909T224614Z
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20221112T154500
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20221112T164500
SUMMARY:Two Kinds of Supererogation
UID:20260910T034238Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-6cf9979bf7-2k8pg
TZID:Europe/London
LOCATION:Faculty of Philosophy\, Oxford\, United Kingdom\, OX2 6GG
DESCRIPTION:<p>Abstract:</p>\n<p>Supererogatory acts are commonly understood as acts that are morally good but not morally required. This understanding of supererogation classifies acts that seem very different&mdash\;heroic acts on the one end and polite acts on the other&mdash\;in the same category of moral evaluation. The common explanation for this phenomenon is that such acts differ only in degree\, both with respect to their moral value as well as to the non moral value lost. I argue that this explanation is mistaken. Heroic acts and polite acts are not just different in degree\, but in kind. The former are properly understood as supererogatory acts beyond duty while the latter are supererogatory acts outwith duty. Supererogation simpliciter is a myth we should do away with.</p>
ORGANIZER;CN=Jen Semler;CN=Kyle van Oosterum;CN=Imogen Rivers;CN=Alexander Arridge;CN=Lewis Williams;CN=Tom Ralston:
METHOD:PUBLISH
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR