BEGIN:VCALENDAR
PRODID:-//Grails iCalendar plugin//NONSGML Grails iCalendar plugin//EN
VERSION:2.0
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20260704T110318Z
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20221113T113000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20221113T123000
SUMMARY:The Evil Demon Meets the Invisible Gorilla
UID:20260710T084244Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@fe80:0:0:0:6495:9dff:fec2:7848%3
TZID:Europe/London
LOCATION:Faculty of Philosophy\, Oxford\, United Kingdom\, OX2 6GG
DESCRIPTION:<p>Abstract:</p>\n<p>Is attention necessary for consciousness? Some philosophers and cognitive scientists believe that it is not. I&rsquo\;ll call this\, "the hypothesis of attentionally elusive experience" or "elusive experience" (EE) for short.&nbsp\;</p>\n<p>In this paper\, I&rsquo\;ll assume that EE is true based on the empirical phenomenon of inattentional &nbsp\;blindness\, and my main purpose is to analyze EE and present a survey of its epistemological &nbsp\;consequences. In particular\, I&rsquo\;ll discuss what EE entails for self-knowledge and the justification of &nbsp\;introspective beliefs. &nbsp\;</p>\n<p>For self-knowledge\, I claim that EE provides the basis for a Gettier case about introspection and a &nbsp\;case of unsafe self-knowledge. For introspective justification\, I claim that EE provides the basis for &nbsp\;counterexamples to constitutivist and reliabilist theories of introspection. Interestingly\, the cases &nbsp\;reveal the problems with the apparent luminosity and lustrousity of phenomenal states and show that &nbsp\;it&rsquo\;s possible to construe 'new evil demon' scenarios about our own minds.</p>\n&nbsp\;
ORGANIZER;CN=Julian Ratcliffe;CN=Jen Semler;CN=Kyle van Oosterum;CN=Imogen Rivers;CN=Alexander Arridge;CN=Tom Ralston;CN=Dom Mcguire:
METHOD:PUBLISH
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR