BEGIN:VCALENDAR
PRODID:-//Grails iCalendar plugin//NONSGML Grails iCalendar plugin//EN
VERSION:2.0
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20260610T200413Z
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Stockholm:20120419T070000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Stockholm:20120421T170000
SUMMARY:Games\, Interactive Rationality and Learning (G.I.R.L.'12@Lund)
UID:20260614T210511Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-bd7db559-gt5qm
TZID:Europe/Stockholm
LOCATION:Lund\, Sweden
DESCRIPTION:<p>Formal philosophy relies increasingly on simulations\, and sometimes on&nbsp\;empirical test\, coming closer to both computer-\, cognitive- and social&nbsp\;sciences. Some examples are learning-theoretic models of inquiry\, network&nbsp\;theory-based approaches in social epistemology\, and game-theoretic&nbsp\;evolutionary approaches of communication. The aim of the G.I.R.L.'12&nbsp\;Conference is to bring together researchers in philosophy\, cognitive science&nbsp\;and artificial intelligence\, to investigate new areas where the game- and&nbsp\;learning-theoretic simulation approaches can lead to fruitful results.<br><br>A central topic is interactive rationality\, or rational behavior that&nbsp\;emerges from interaction. Unlike &ldquo\;rational interaction&rdquo\;&mdash\;its much better&nbsp\;known sister&mdash\;it does not presuppose agents to be rational to begin with.&nbsp\;Examples are given by evolutionary game-theory\, which studies rational&nbsp\;(equilibrium-reaching) behavior emerging from interaction of non-reflective&nbsp\;agents\; or learning-theoretic models of inquiry showing how inquiry can&nbsp\;solve inductive problems\, while substituting truth-tracking efficiency to&nbsp\;reflexive justification.</p>\n<p><strong>Program</strong></p>\n<p><strong>April 19</strong></p>\n<p><strong>09:00-9:30 &nbsp\;&nbsp\;</strong>Coffee and welcome</p>\n<p>Room: 104 &ndash\; Chair: Kevin Kelly</p>\n<p><strong>9:30-10:30 &nbsp\;</strong><strong>Erik J. Olsson:</strong>&nbsp\;<em>Probabilistic Belief Updating in Social Networks</em></p>\n<p><strong>10:30-11:30 &nbsp\;</strong><strong>Staffan Angere:</strong>&nbsp\;<em>The Problem of Priors in a Social Setting</em></p>\n<p><strong>11:30-12:30 &nbsp\;</strong><strong>Erik Mohlin:</strong>&nbsp\;<em>Evolution of Theories of Mind</em></p>\n<p><strong>12:30-13:30 &nbsp\;</strong>Lunch break</p>\n<p>Room: 104 &ndash\; Chair: Alexandru Baltag</p>\n<p><strong>13:30-14:30 &nbsp\;</strong><strong>Pelle Guldborg Hansen:</strong>&nbsp\;<em>The Evolution of Convention and the Problem of Conceptualization</em></p>\n<p><strong>14:30-15:30 &nbsp\;</strong><strong>Aron Vallinder:</strong>&nbsp\;<em>Is the Principle of Charity Efficient?</em></p>\n<p><strong>15:30-16:00 &nbsp\;</strong>Coffee break</p>\n<p><strong>16:00-17:00 &nbsp\;</strong><strong>Jennifer Juhn:</strong>&nbsp\;<em>Rationality\, Belief Revision\, and Simplicity</em></p>\n<p><strong>17:00-18:00 &nbsp\;</strong><strong>Till Gr&uuml\;ne-Yanoff:</strong>&nbsp\;<em>Evolutionary Game Theory\, Learning Dynamics and Mechanisms</em></p>\n<p><strong>April 20</strong></p>\n<p>Room: 104 &ndash\; Chair: Staffan Angere</p>\n<p><strong>09:00-10:00 &nbsp\;</strong><strong>Nina Gierasimczuk:</strong>&nbsp\;<em>Iterated Belief Revision in the Limit</em></p>\n<p><strong>10:00-11:00 &nbsp\;</strong><strong>Alexandru Baltag:</strong><em>&nbsp\;</em><em>How Good is Bayesian Conditioning at Tracking the Truth?</em></p>\n<p><strong>11:00-12:00 &nbsp\;</strong><strong>Sonja Smets:</strong><em>&nbsp\;</em><em>Playing for &ldquo\;Knowledge&rdquo\;</em></p>\n<p><strong>12:00-13:00 &nbsp\;</strong>Lunch break</p>\n<p>Room: 203 &ndash\; Chair:&nbsp\;Nina Gierasimczuk</p>\n<p><strong>13:00-14:00 &nbsp\;</strong><strong>Kevin Kelly:</strong>&nbsp\;<em>Learning Theoretic Models for Modal Epistemic Logic</em></p>\n<p><strong>14:00-15:00 &nbsp\;</strong><strong>Patricia Rich:</strong>&nbsp\;<em>Heuristics for Strategic Choice</em></p>\n<p><strong>15:00-15:30 &nbsp\;</strong>Coffee break</p>\n<p><strong>15:30-16:30 &nbsp\;</strong><strong>Christian Balkenius:</strong>&nbsp\;<em>Learning Behavior in Context</em></p>\n<p><strong>16:30-17:30 &nbsp\;</strong><strong>Peter G&auml\;rdenfors:</strong>&nbsp\;(joint work with Massimo Warglien)&nbsp\;<em>Semantics as a Meeting of Minds</em></p>\n<p><strong>19:00 &nbsp\;</strong>Conference dinner</p>\n<p><strong>April 21</strong></p>\n<p>Room: 203 &ndash\; Chair: Sonja Smets</p>\n<p><strong>09:00-10:00 &nbsp\;</strong><strong>Ruth Poproski:</strong><em>&nbsp\;Words With Friends: Simulating Conversational Language Use</em></p>\n<p><strong>10:00-11:00 &nbsp\;</strong><strong>Elliott O. Wagner:</strong><em>&nbsp\;</em><em>Divergent Interests and the Evolution of Inference</em></p>\n<p><strong>11:00-12:00 &nbsp\;</strong><strong>Cailin O'Connor:</strong><em>&nbsp\;</em><em>The Evolution of Vagueness</em></p>
ORGANIZER;CN=Emmanuel Genot;CN=Justine Jacot;CN="Philip Pärnamets":
METHOD:PUBLISH
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR
