BEGIN:VCALENDAR
PRODID:-//Grails iCalendar plugin//NONSGML Grails iCalendar plugin//EN
VERSION:2.0
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20260513T185405Z
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20230525T090000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20230526T170000
SUMMARY:Hierarchy\, Meritocracy and Democracy
UID:20260519T004910Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-6b96c54f56-bljdq
TZID:Europe/London
DESCRIPTION:<p>The political meritocrats\, many of whom work on East Asian political circumstances and ideas\, argue that there are considerable deficiencies of modern democratic politics\, and that to address these deficiencies\, core positions of authority should be allocated by merit rather than popular elections. To that end\, they maintain\, the democratically elected officials of the core executive and/or legislature should be constrained if not replaced by some meritocratically selected officials\, chosen by examinations\, interviews\, peer recommendations\, assessments of bureaucratic performance and so on\, all of which are designed to assess one&rsquo\;s abilities to serve important political decision-making roles. The democracy-meritocracy debate\, moreover\, straddles some recent discussions of just hierarchies.</p>\n<p>Supported by the ESRC\, the University of Southampton is pleased to hold an online workshop that brings together the perspectives on any aspect of the democracy-meritocracy debate. Various scholars specialised at the debate are invited.</p>\n<p>Submissions can\, for example\, address the following:</p>\n<p>&middot\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\; Whether political meritocracy is consistent with different requirements of justice/legitimacy (e.g. public reason)\;</p>\n<p>&middot\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\; Interpretations of normative concepts such as justice\, legitimacy\, authority\, equality\, hierarchy\, democracy\, meritocracy and equality\, and their implications for the democracy-meritocracy debate\;</p>\n<p>&middot\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\; Arguments for/against hierarchical relationships in different contexts\;</p>\n<p>&middot\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\; Methods of assessing the merit of candidates for public office\;</p>\n<p>&middot\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\; The relevance of epistocracy or epistemic democracy to the democracy-meritocracy debate\; and</p>\n<p>&middot\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\; The feasibility of practising political meritocracy in different contexts.</p>\n<p>Submissions exploring non-Western philosophies or other underrepresented traditions are particularly welcomed. Early career researchers are especially encouraged to apply.</p>\n<p>Please submit your abstract (less than 700 words) to <a href="mailto:W.C.Chan@soton.ac.uk">W.C.Chan@soton.ac.uk</a>. Authors should also attach a separate document with their name\, institutional affiliation\, paper title and email.</p>\n<p>For those interested in participating in the workshop\, please register using the link below:</p>\n<p><a href="https://forms.office.com/Pages/ResponsePage.aspx?id=-XhTSvQpPk2-iWadA62p2EQ1c_3P475GkqikZ5mpJIRUOU1XVVVJUlhQM1U0Vlg0UVFUQU5TTTdGVC4u">https://forms.office.com/Pages/ResponsePage.aspx?id=-XhTSvQpPk2-iWadA62p2EQ1c_3P475GkqikZ5mpJIRUOU1XVVVJUlhQM1U0Vlg0UVFUQU5TTTdGVC4u</a></p>\n<p><strong>Confirmed Speakers: </strong></p>\n<p>Daniel A. Bell\, Pei Wang\, Joseph Chan\, Tongdong Bai\, Loubna El Amine\, Ranjoo Herr\, Elena Ziliotti</p>\n<p><strong>Key Dates</strong>:</p>\n<p>Abstract Submission Deadline: 30th April 2023</p>\n<p>Decisions of Acceptance: 7th May 2023</p>\n<p>Registration Deadline: 21st May 2023</p>\n<p>Workshop Dates: 25th and 26th May 2023</p>
ORGANIZER:
METHOD:PUBLISH
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR