Philosophy has recently seen two methodological shifts that have changed many philosophers' self-conception of their research. The first\, experimental philosophy\, proceeds under the belief that many philosophical questions\, traditionally seen to require only careful thought to solve\, actually often rest on complex hidden empirical questions. The second methodological shift\, conceptual engineering\, sees the goal of philosophy to identify defective concepts and then design and spread improved replacement concepts.
\nMany have argued that conceptual engineering needs experimental philosophy to succeed\, yet the ways in which the two methods are intertwined has only begun to be mapped and explored in practice. This workshop aims to explore two main questions: First\, should empirical methods be used by conceptual engineers? Second\, what does empirical conceptual engineering involve and how should it proceed?
Possible topics include but are not limited to:
\n
Demonstrations of empirical conceptual engineering
Mapping the intersection between conceptual engineering and empirical disciplines
\nThe limits of empirical data to conceptual engineering
\nWhat conceptual engineers can learn from historical case studies
\nAdjusting experimental philosophy to better serve conceptual engineering (or vice versa)
Please send an abstract (500 words) to ethan.landes@uzh.ch by 30 September. Participants will hear of the decision by 7 October.
\n\n ORGANIZER;CN=Ethan Landes;CN=Aneta Zuber;CN=Lucien Baumgartner: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT END:VCALENDAR