BEGIN:VCALENDAR
PRODID:-//Grails iCalendar plugin//NONSGML Grails iCalendar plugin//EN
VERSION:2.0
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20260930T171207Z
DTSTART;TZID=Australia/Melbourne:20231006T153000
DTEND;TZID=Australia/Melbourne:20231006T170000
SUMMARY:Germinal Events: organisation and metastability in Simondon and Bergson
UID:20261005T182845Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@fe80:0:0:0:ac83:5bff:fea0:108%3
TZID:Australia/Melbourne
LOCATION:Deakin Downtown\, Melbourne\, Australia
DESCRIPTION:<p><strong>Dr Tim Deane-Freeman (Deakin) -</strong><strong>Germinal Events: organisation and metastability in Simondon and Bergson</strong></p>\n<p><strong>&nbsp\;</strong></p>\n<p><strong>Date: Friday 6 October 2023 | Time: 3.30pm | Venue: Deakin Downtown (also on zoom &ndash\; &ldquo\;hybrid&rdquo\; &ndash\; link below)</strong></p>\n\n<p><strong>Abstract:</strong></p>\n<p>In a preparatory manuscript for his primary doctoral thesis\, <em>Individuation in Light of Notions of Form and Information</em>\, Gilbert Simondon will characterise Bergson&rsquo\;s project as an &ldquo\;aristocratism\,&rdquo\; predicated as it is on a schism which opposes a properly philosophical thought of temporal continuities (<em>intuition</em>)\, to &ldquo\;interested\, materialising\, spatialising and utilitarian thought\, i.e. thought attached to artificial or natural structures&hellip\;&rdquo\; For Simondon\, this distinction sees structure\, understood as an ensemble of discontinuous elements with the potential to effect productive differential relations (<em>individuations</em>)\, denigrated as the object of a &ldquo\;dishonoured\, dismissed\, and second-class intuition\,&rdquo\; rendering Bergson&rsquo\;s thought increasingly inadequate to contemporary developments in science and technology. Simondon&rsquo\;s attention to these developments\, and to &ldquo\;events&rdquo\; of discontinuity encountered in fields like quantum physics\, inorganic chemistry and non-equilibrium thermodynamics\, thus informs his own determination to articulate the inhuman and ontogenetic <em>reality of structure</em>. I&rsquo\;d like to suggest\, however\, that this initial precis hides a more complex reality\, and a profound solidarity between these thinkers&rsquo\; respective projects and ambitions. What both Bergson and Simondon share\, indeed\, is a hostility to interested and anthropocentric modes of conceptualisation which occlude a thought of evolution and emergence\, and an attendant conviction that philosophy must itself individuate against the horizon of scientific methods and innovations. In this context\, I argue that Simondon is perhaps already engaged in what Gilles Deleuze will subsequently call a &ldquo\;return to Bergson\,&rdquo\; extending and renewing the latter&rsquo\;s project to think <em>with </em>science in order to dislocate our all-too-human intellectual habitudes. I will close with some brief reflections on this latter point\, suggesting the pertinence of both Bergson and Simondon as ecological thinkers today.</p>\n<p>Join Zoom Meeting <br> <a href="https://deakin.zoom.us/j/86768681570?pwd=ckRmK1U4QkU5bTJnSlhkUkFncG5rUT09">https://deakin.zoom.us/j/86768681570?pwd=ckRmK1U4QkU5bTJnSlhkUkFncG5rUT09</a></p>\n\n<p>Meeting ID: 867 6868 1570 <br> Password: 65853703&nbsp\;</p>\n
ORGANIZER;CN=George Duke:
METHOD:PUBLISH
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR
