BEGIN:VCALENDAR
PRODID:-//Grails iCalendar plugin//NONSGML Grails iCalendar plugin//EN
VERSION:2.0
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20260606T174548Z
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20231016T153000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20231016T170000
SUMMARY:Expected Utility\, the Pond Analogy and Imperfect Duties
UID:20260613T034503Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-bd7db559-gt5qm
TZID:Europe/London
DESCRIPTION:<p><strong>The Collective Ethics Seminar: Online Presentation &ndash\; 16 October 2023 - 15.30 - 17.00 CET / 09.30 - 11.00 EST</strong></p>\n<p><strong>Julia Nefsky (University of Toronto) - Expected Utility\, the Pond Analogy and Imperfect Duties<br> </strong></p>\n<p>On Monday 16 October\, Julia Nefsky (University of Toronto) will give a presentation in the Collective Ethics Seminar entitled: 'Expected Utility\, the Pond Analogy and Imperfect Duties'.<br> </p>\n<p><strong>Abstract</strong><strong>:</strong>&nbsp\;This talk brings together ideas from two papers that I am co-writing with Sergio Tenenbaum.&nbsp\;In the first half of the talk\, I will discuss the expected utility approach to individual obligations in collective impact contexts (like climate change). We argue that in addition to concerns that&nbsp\;have been raised in the past\, there is a more basic problem with the approach &ndash\; an internal error with the reasoning involved. I will then\, in the second half of the talk\, turn to a discussion of our duties to donate money\, and specifically Peter Singer&rsquo\;s Pond Analogy and its implications. We&nbsp\;argue that various seemingly promising replies to Singer&nbsp\;do not succeed. After briefly explaining why\, I then&nbsp\;turn to what we think is the right way to get out of the analogy. The objection to the expected utility approach presented in the first part of the talk plays an important role.&nbsp\;It also informs what we think is the right way to understand our obligations in collective impact contexts &ndash\; namely\, as imperfect duties. I will close by suggesting that the same structure that we describe for imperfect duties in collective impact contexts generalizes to other imperfect duties as well.</p>\n<p>The online seminar is open for all to attend. The other remaining presenters this semester areAvia Pasternak (University of Toronto)\, Veli Mitova (University of Johannesburg)\, Frank Hindriks (University of Groningen)\, Barbara Vetter (FU Berlin)\, Anne Schwenkenbecher (Murdoch University)\, and Maeve McKeown (University of Groningen).For more information about the seminar and the schedule\, please see <u>https://social.univie.ac.at/events/collective-ethics-seminar/</a></u>.<br>  <br>  The session starts at 15.30 CEST / 09.30 EST. You can join the session via the following link: <a href="https://univienna.zoom.us/j/62736288881?pwd=SndEdTNoNlZtSzJqcmpabm5NaWIyUT09">https://univienna.zoom.us/j/62736288881?pwd=SndEdTNoNlZtSzJqcmpabm5NaWIyUT09</a> <br>  <br>  We hope to see you at the seminar!<br>  <br>  Kind regards\,<br>  <br>  Gunnar Bj&ouml\;rnsson (Stockholm University)\, Olle Blomberg (University of Gothenburg)\, and Niels de Haan (University of Vienna)</p>\n\n
ORGANIZER;CN=Niels de Haan;CN=Olle Blomberg;CN="Gunnar Björnsson":
METHOD:PUBLISH
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR
