BEGIN:VCALENDAR
PRODID:-//Grails iCalendar plugin//NONSGML Grails iCalendar plugin//EN
VERSION:2.0
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20260405T115248Z
DTSTART;TZID=America/Indiana/Indianapolis:20141024T100000
DTEND;TZID=America/Indiana/Indianapolis:20141025T180000
SUMMARY:Hegel\, Analytical Philosophy\, and Formal Logic
UID:20260405T193709Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-f5d4878dd-4s97k
TZID:America/Indiana/Indianapolis
LOCATION:Fort Wayne\, United States
DESCRIPTION:<p>We are happy to issue a Call for Papers on Hegel\, Analytical<br> Philosophy\, and Formal Logic. Paul Redding (University of Sydney) and<br> Clark Butler (Purdue University\, Indiana-Purdue Fort Wayne Campus) will<br> coordinate this conference on the Fort Wayne Campus\, Fort Wayne Indiana<br> 26805 USA\, Friday and Saturday\, October 24-25\, 2014.</p>\n<p>Invited speakers include Robert Brandom (Pittsburgh) Ermanno<br> Bencivenga (UC-Irvine)\,Angelica Nuzzo (CUNY Graduate Center)\, and Graham<br> Pries (CUNY Graduate Center). The coordinators will also partake.</p>\n<p>Formal logic will be understood as post-Aristotelean logic up to the<br> present. In recent years certain philosophers\, Hegel scholars\, neo-<br> Hegelians\, and analytic philosophers have begun to increasingly<br> communicate. Yet some who know Hegel find his criticism of "formal logic"<br> as justification not reopening the question. Others in the analytic<br> tradition\, especially logicians\, plead ignorance of Hegel\, making them<br> incapable of judging whether any formal logical treatment helps us<br> understand the historical Hegel.</p>\n<p>Sample questions to be addressed by presenters are: &ldquo\;Would Hegel\, if<br> alive today\, see more merit in contemporary formal logic than in<br> Aristotelian logic?&rdquo\; &ldquo\;Can non-standard types of formal logic help clarify<br> Hegel\, or is the cause of making Hegel clearer better served by using<br> standard formal logic&mdash\;the formal logic known to mainstream philosophers<br> generally having taken an advanced undergraduate course and perhaps one or<br> even several more advanced graduate courses?&rdquo\; &ldquo\;Can the traditional view of<br> many Hegel scholars that contentless formal logic is useless in making<br> Hegel clear be rethought through formal logics other than the one<br> understood either by Hegel or by writers of standard symbolic<br> textbooks&rdquo\; &ldquo\;Can Hegel be understood better by developing the contrast<br> between dialectical logic and formal logic beyond the point he left it\, or<br> is dialectical logic assimilable to a formal logic capable of expressing<br> REASON rather than merely the UNDERSTANDING?&rdquo\;</p>\n<p>butler@ipfw.edu</p>
ORGANIZER;CN=Clark Butler;CN=Paul  Redding:
METHOD:PUBLISH
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR
