BEGIN:VCALENDAR
PRODID:-//Grails iCalendar plugin//NONSGML Grails iCalendar plugin//EN
VERSION:2.0
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20260626T153227Z
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Rome:20240201T090000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Rome:20240202T170000
SUMMARY:Normative Political Theory and Empirical Research: Approaches\, Methods and Challenges
UID:20260703T235244Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-bd7db559-gt5qm
TZID:Europe/Rome
LOCATION:Monash University Prato Centre\, Prato\, Italy
DESCRIPTION:<p>Workshop<strong></strong></p>\n<p><strong>&nbsp\;</strong></p>\n<p><strong>Normative Political Theory and Empirical Research: </strong></p>\n<p><strong>Approaches\, Methods and Challenges</strong><strong></strong></p>\n\n<p>Monash University Prato Centre (Tuscany\, Italy)\, 1-2 February 2024</p>\n\n<p><strong><u>Thursday 1 February 2024</u></strong></p>\n<p><strong>&nbsp\;</strong></p>\n<p><strong>9:00-10:00 &ndash\; Panel 1</strong></p>\n\n<p>Chair: Matteo Bonotti (Monash University)</p>\n\n<p>Speakers:</p>\n\n<p>Hrayr Manukyan (Utrecht University) &ndash\; &lsquo\;Normative Theorisation and Protests: The Case of Civil Disobedience in Non-Democratic Contexts&rsquo\; (in person)</p>\n\n<p>Sania Mariam (IITB-Monash Research Academy) &ndash\; &lsquo\;The Life of a Pledge: A Case Study of the Promise of Uniform Civil Code in India&rsquo\; (online)</p>\n<p><strong>&nbsp\;</strong></p>\n<p><strong>&nbsp\;</strong></p>\n<p><strong>10:00-11:00 &ndash\; Tea/coffee break</strong></p>\n\n<p><strong>&nbsp\;</strong></p>\n<p><strong>11:00-12:45 &ndash\; Panel 2</strong></p>\n\n<p>Chair: Matteo Dutto (Monash University)</p>\n\n<p>Aur&eacute\;lia Bardon (University of Konstanz)\, Matteo Bonotti (Monash University) and Steven T. Zech (Monash University) &ndash\; &lsquo\;Civility and Contentious Monuments&rsquo\; (in person)</p>\n\n<p>James Hickson (University of Liverpool) &ndash\; &lsquo\;Precarious Places: Inequality\, Vulnerability\, and Domination in &ldquo\;Left Behind&rdquo\; Communities&rsquo\; (in person)</p>\n\n<p>Jemima McKenna (University of Melbourne) &ndash\; &lsquo\;Understanding Power Asymmetry in Externalisation Practices: A Conceptual Map of Domination&rsquo\; (in person)</p>\n\n<p>Juliette Monvoisin (Paris 1 Panth&eacute\;on-Sorbonne) &ndash\; &lsquo\;Towards an Empirically-Anchored Conception of States&rsquo\; Obligations of Migration Justice&rsquo\; (in person)</p>\n\n<p><strong>&nbsp\;</strong></p>\n<p><strong>12:45-13:45 &ndash\; Lunch</strong></p>\n<p><strong>&nbsp\;</strong></p>\n<p><strong>13:45-15:30 &ndash\; Panel 3</strong></p>\n\n<p>Chair: Andrea Borghini (University of Milan)</p>\n\n<p>Martina Giovine (Universit&agrave\; Vita-Salute San Raffaele) &ndash\; &lsquo\;Gender-fair Language: Against Hierarchies of Power&rsquo\; (online)</p>\n\n<p>Diarmait Mac Giolla Chriost (Cardiff University) and Hannah Griffiths (Cardiff University) &ndash\; &lsquo\;Linguistic Justice in Ireland: A Content Analysis Approach&rsquo\; (online)</p>\n\n<p>Mar&iacute\;a P&iacute\;a M&eacute\;ndez (Universidad Mayor\, Santiago) &ndash\; &lsquo\;Lived Experiences: Bringing Back the Applied Component to Our Feminist Inquiries&rsquo\; (online)</p>\n\n<p>Samu/elle Striewski (Freie Universit&auml\;t Berlin) &ndash\; &lsquo\;Between Facts and Gender Norms &ndash\; How Queer Recognition Should Be Struggled for\, and What Actually Happens&rsquo\; (online)</p>\n\n<p><strong>&nbsp\;</strong></p>\n<p><strong>15:30-15:45 &ndash\; Tea/coffee break </strong></p>\n\n<p><strong>&nbsp\;</strong></p>\n<p><strong>15:45-17:30 &ndash\; Panel 4</strong></p>\n\n<p>Chair: Aur&eacute\;lia Bardon (University of Konstanz)</p>\n\n<p>Speakers</p>\n\n<p>Marlon Barbeh&ouml\;n (Heidelberg University) - &lsquo\;Normative Political Theory\, Ethnography and &ldquo\;Seeing Like A City&rdquo\;&rsquo\; (in person)</p>\n\n<p>Edmund Handby (Duke University) &ndash\; &lsquo\;Against Method and Empirically Informed Political Theory&rsquo\; (online)</p>\n\n<p>Nahshon Perez (Bar Ilan University) &ndash\; &lsquo\;Demarcating Normative Political Theory from Political Science - And Why It Methodologically Matters&rsquo\; (online)</p>\n\n<p>Marta Wojciechowska (King&rsquo\;s College London) &ndash\; &lsquo\;Political Philosophers as &ldquo\;Attendants&rdquo\;&rsquo\; (in person)</p>\n<p><strong><u>&nbsp\;</u></strong></p>\n<p><strong><u>&nbsp\;</u></strong></p>\n<p><strong><u>Friday 2 February 2024</u></strong></p>\n\n<p><strong>9:00-11:00 &ndash\; Panel 5</strong></p>\n<p><strong>&nbsp\;</strong></p>\n<p>Chair: Matteo Bonotti (Monash University)</p>\n\n<p>Speakers:</p>\n\n<p>Matt Bennett (University of Essex) &ndash\; &lsquo\;Who Wants Desert?&rsquo\; (online)</p>\n\n<p>Michele Loi (Algorithmwatch Germany) &ndash\; &lsquo\;Navigating the Complexity of Algorithmic Bias in Healthcare: A Closer Look at Fairness Measures and &ldquo\;Desert&rdquo\; Features&rsquo\; (in person)</p>\n\n<p>Gijs van Maanen (Tilburg University) &ndash\; &lsquo\;Studying Open Government and Open Data: Public Philosophy Meets Praxiography&rsquo\; (online)</p>\n\n<p>Juri Viehoff (University of Utrecht) and Markus Kneer (University of Graz) &ndash\; &lsquo\;Fair Chances vs. Better Outcomes? What the People Think (and How It Matters for Public Decision-Making)&rsquo\; (in person)</p>\n<p><strong>&nbsp\;</strong></p>\n<p><strong>&nbsp\;</strong></p>\n<p><strong>11:00-11:30 &ndash\; Tea/coffee break</strong></p>\n<p><strong>&nbsp\;</strong></p>\n<p><strong>&nbsp\;</strong></p>\n<p><strong>11:30-13:00 &ndash\; Panel 6</strong></p>\n\n<p>Chair: Marta Wojciechowska (King&rsquo\;s College London)</p>\n\n<p>Speakers:</p>\n\n<p>Nenad Stojanović (University of Geneva) and Emanuela Ceva (University of Geneva) &ndash\; &lsquo\;Exploring Electoral Discrimination through an Ethics of Office Accountability&rsquo\; (in person)</p>\n\n<p>Michael Buckley (City University of New York) &ndash\; &lsquo\;Methodological Constructivism&rsquo\; (in person)</p>\n\n<p>John Park (California State University\, Sacramento) &ndash\; &lsquo\;Meritocracy Over Democracy and Epistocracy for Minority Rights&rsquo\; (in person)</p>\n\n<p><strong>&nbsp\;</strong></p>\n<p><strong>13:00-13:45 - Lunch</strong></p>\n\n<p><strong>13:45-15:45 &ndash\; Panel 7</strong></p>\n\n<p>Chair: Nenad Stojanović (University of Geneva)</p>\n\n<p>Speakers: </p>\n\n<p>Matteo Bonotti (Monash University) and Daniel Susser (Cornell University) &ndash\; &lsquo\;Privacy Mini-Publics: A Deliberative Democratic Approach to Understanding Informational Norms&rsquo\; (in person)</p>\n\n<p>Geert Demuijnck (EDHEC Business School) &ndash\; &lsquo\;Naturalistic Approaches to Normative Discussions and the Naturalistic Fallacy&rsquo\; (in person)</p>\n\n<p>Hsin-Wen Lee (University of Delaware) &ndash\; &lsquo\;The Philosopher King and His Cave: The Vice of Abstract Moral Reasoning&rsquo\; (online)</p>\n\n<p>Gregory Robson (University of Notre Dame and Iowa State University) &ndash\; &lsquo\;Representing Constituents and Representing Justice: Challenges Aplenty&rsquo\; (online)</p>\n\n<p>Michael W. Schmidt (Karlsruhe Institute of Technology) and Christine Milchram (Karlsruhe Institute of Technology) &ndash\; &lsquo\;Integrating Stakeholder&rsquo\;s Conceptions of Fairness and Normative Reasoning: A Wide Reflective Equilibrium Approach&rsquo\; (in person)</p>\n\n<p><strong>&nbsp\;</strong></p>\n<p><strong>15:45-17:45 &ndash\; Panel 8</strong></p>\n\n<p>Chair: Matteo Bonotti (Monash University)</p>\n\n<p>Emerson Bodde (Clemson University) &ndash\; &lsquo\;&ldquo\;Both Reality and Ideal&rdquo\;: Doing Epistemic-Democratic Theory through Chinese Political Reality&rsquo\; (online)</p>\n\n<p>Gideon Calder (Swansea University) and Patrick Cockburn (Swansea University) &ndash\; &lsquo\;Description\, Injustice and the Justification of Normative claims&rsquo\; (online)</p>\n\n<p>Gen Fukushima (Waseda University) &ndash\; &lsquo\;To Be Entitled and to Be Believed to Be Entitled: On the Relationship between Normative and Descriptive Legitimacy&rsquo\; (in person)</p>\n\n<p>Laure Gillot-Assayag (Ecole des Hautes Etudes en Sciences Sociales) &ndash\; &lsquo\;Solving the Puzzle of Political Compromise? How to Unite Normative Philosophy and Empirical Insights for a Comprehensive Understanding of Political Compromise&rsquo\; (online)</p>\n\n<p>Davide Saracino (University of Milan) &ndash\; &lsquo\;Legitimacy for Hogs. What People&rsquo\;s Selfishness Tells Us About the State&rsquo\;s Right to Rule&rsquo\; (online)</p>
ORGANIZER;CN=Matteo Bonotti;CN=Sania Mariam:
METHOD:PUBLISH
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR