BEGIN:VCALENDAR
PRODID:-//Grails iCalendar plugin//NONSGML Grails iCalendar plugin//EN
VERSION:2.0
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20260605T163805Z
DTSTART;TZID=Australia/Melbourne:20131015T170000
DTEND;TZID=Australia/Melbourne:20131015T183000
SUMMARY:Direct Perception\, Inter-subjectivity\, and Social Cognition: More to the Other than Meets the Eye?
UID:20260609T081034Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-bd7db559-gt5qm
TZID:Australia/Melbourne
LOCATION:221 Burwood Highway\, Burwood\, Australia\, 3125
DESCRIPTION:<p>In this paper I argue that many of the core phenomenological insights are a necessary but not sufficient condition for an adequate account of inter-subjectivity today. I take it that an adequate account of inter-subjectivity must involve substantial interaction with empirical studies\, notwithstanding the putative methodological differences between phenomenological description and scientific explanation. As such\, I will need to explicate what kind of phenomenology survives\, and indeed\, thrives\, in a milieu that necessitates engagement with the relevant sciences\, albeit not necessarily deference to them. There will be two central aims to this paper: 1. to defend the centrality and vitality of phenomenological treatments of inter-subjectivity - which I do think possess a non-trivial unity amongst the various interlocutors - and the manner in which they in fact serve to provide the basis for a better explanation of an array of empirical data than existing inferentialist or mindreading accounts of social cognition (notably Theory Theory\, Simulation Theory\, and hybrid versions)\; 2. to offer the methodological resources for renewing phenomenology in a manner that acknowledges ostensibly nonphenomenological moments in theory production - which involve explanation\, inference to the best explanation\, etc. - but does not abandon phenomenology for all that\, allowing it tobe simply absorbed into empirical explanation or other forms of philosophical analysis without remainder.</p>\n<p>Jack Reynolds is Deputy Dean\, Associate Professor and Philosophy Program Coordinator at La Trobe University. He has written four books: <em>Chronopathologies: The Politics of Time in Deleuze\, Derrida\, Analytic Philosophy and Phenomenology</em> (Lexington Books 2012)\, <em>Analytic Versus Continental: Arguments on the Methods and Value of Philosophy</em> (Acumen 2010\, with James Chase)\, <em>Merleau-Ponty and Derrida: Intertwining Embodiment and Alterity</em> (Ohio 2004)\, <em>Understanding Existentialism</em> (Acumen 2006). He has also co-edited four collections: <em>Continuum Companion to Existentialism</em> (2011)\, <em>Postanalytic and Metacontinental: Crossing Philosophical Divides </em>(Continuum 2010)\, <em>Merleau-Ponty: Key Concepts</em> (Acumen 2008) and <em>Understanding Derrida </em>(Continuum 2004). He is currently doing research on inter-subjectivity and the perception of others\, drawing on the phenomenological tradition as well as findings in developmental psychology and the cognitive sciences.</p>
ORGANIZER;CN=Sean Bowden:
METHOD:PUBLISH
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR
