Workshop on Experimental Semantics in Philosophy:
\nTrondheim\, Norway.
\nMay 30-31\, 2024.
\nOrganized by EXLANG\, the Research Group for Experimental Philosophy of Language at NTNU Trondheim.
\nLocal organizers:
\nJussi Haukioja\, NTNU Trondheim\, jussi.haukioja@ntnu.no
\nJeske Toorman\, NTNU Trondheim\, jeske.toorman@ntnu.no
\nInvited speakers:
\nDaniel Cohnitz (Utrecht University)
\nMichael Devitt (CUNY)
\nJincai Li (Shanghai Jiao Tong University)
\nEdouard Machery (University of Pittsburgh)
\nGenoveva Martí\; (University of Barcelona)
\nTopic:
\nSince the publication of Machery et al.&rsquo\;s &ldquo\;Semantics\, Cross-Cultural Style&rdquo\; (2004)\, experimental methods have gained more and more foothold in philosophy of language. Different theorists have had very different aims in conducting experimental work: Machery et al. aimed to undermine the widespread reliance on intuitions about fictional cases as evidence in philosophy of language\, while more recently\, many philosophers of language have started to appeal to experimental data on ordinary speakers&rsquo\; usage and judgments about meaning and reference as evidence for and against philosophical theories. Despite this divergence in aims\, there is quite broad agreement among philosophers of language that experimental work can at least in principle be of relevance for philosophy of language. Most theorists agree that the facts that theories in philosophy of language attempt to get right &ndash\; for example\, the facts about reference or meaning &ndash\; are intimately connected to how language is in fact used. This makes experimental work potentially relevant to philosophy of language\, in a much more direct way than in other areas of philosophy.
\nAt the same time\, experimental philosophy of language is in many ways in its infancy\, not least methodologically. There is no general consensus regarding what kinds of experimental design are best fit for investigating reference\, meaning\, and other linguistic phenomena of interest to philosophers. Developing valid experimental designs requires first-order philosophical work on the foundations of reference\, meaning\, and other linguistic phenomena.
\nThis workshop will bring together both established names in experimental philosophy of language and more junior researchers\, and the contributions will include both papers presenting new experimental data\, and papers with a more methodological and metaphilosophical focus\, clarifying the relevance &ndash\; or lack thereof &ndash\; of experimental work in general as well as the results from particular types of experimental setups\, for philosophy of language.
\nCall for Abstracts:
\nIn addition to the invited speakers\, we will have space for 2-4 contributed papers on the programme. Submissions should include both a short abstract (max 200 words) and an extended abstract (max 1000 words). Please anonymize both the short and the extended abstract\, include them in a single pdf document\, and send the document as an attachment to an email with subject &ldquo\;Submission to Experimental Semantics Workshop&rdquo\;\, to Jeske Toorman (jeske.toorman@ntnu.no) by February 29. Please provide author and affiliation information in the body of the email.
\nThe authors of accepted papers will also be encouraged to submit their manuscripts to a Thematic Symposium on Experimental semantics in philosophy\, in Philosophical Studies\, edited by the workshop organizers.
\nImportant dates:
\nDeadline for submissions: February 29
\nNotification of acceptance: March 15
\nIf you would like to attend the workshop without presenting anything\, please notify us in advance before May 1\, due to limited space. All inquiries about the workshop should be sent by email to Jeske Toorman: jeske.toorman@ntnu.no.
ORGANIZER;CN=Jussi Haukioja;CN=Jeske Toorman: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT END:VCALENDAR