BEGIN:VCALENDAR
PRODID:-//Grails iCalendar plugin//NONSGML Grails iCalendar plugin//EN
VERSION:2.0
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20260525T035526Z
DTSTART;TZID=America/Los_Angeles:20240210T090000
DTEND;TZID=America/Los_Angeles:20240210T170000
SUMMARY:On Reflection
UID:20260615T005339Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-6b96c54f56-bljdq
TZID:America/Los_Angeles
LOCATION:University of California\, Irvine\, Irvine\, United States\, 92697
DESCRIPTION:<p>On standard approaches to Bayesian epistemology\, a rational agent's beliefs must satisfy the&nbsp\;<em>reflection principle</em>: the agent's expectations about their future credence in some proposition must be compatible with their current credence\, where precisely what "compatibility" means can be spelled out in several ways.&nbsp\; In recent work\, Kevin Dorst and Michael Rescorla have given (different) arguments that reflection need not hold in general\, even for rational agents.&nbsp\; This meeting will bring together philosophers working on the status of reflection principles and on conditionalization more broadly to assess the status of reflection\, in light of these recent arguments and more generally.</p>
ORGANIZER;CN=James Weatherall;CN=Kenny Easwaran;CN=Simon Huttegger;CN=Jeffrey Barrett:
METHOD:PUBLISH
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR
