BEGIN:VCALENDAR
PRODID:-//Grails iCalendar plugin//NONSGML Grails iCalendar plugin//EN
VERSION:2.0
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20260627T020312Z
DTSTART;TZID=Australia/Melbourne:20240301T140000
DTEND;TZID=Australia/Melbourne:20240301T153000
SUMMARY:Humean Varieties of Scepticism and Naturalism
UID:20260705T183303Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-bd7db559-gt5qm
TZID:Australia/Melbourne
LOCATION:Monash Clayton Campus\, Melbourne\, Australia\, 3800
DESCRIPTION:<p>Join Zoom meeting:</p>\n<p>https://monash.zoom.us/j/88062345198?pwd=R1lUUGtSOXUwdTJydVlPODB3czdSUT09&nbsp\;</p>\n<p>Meeting ID: 880 6234 5198</p>\n<p>Passcode: 484858</p>\n\n<p><br>Abstract: David Hume&rsquo\;s philosophy is standardly interpreted as both sceptical and naturalistic\, and as such has been inspirational to contemporary thought across a wide range of areas\, including epistemology\, metaphysics\, philosophy of mind\, ethics\, and philosophy of religion. &nbsp\;A popular interpretative narrative &ndash\; deriving from Norman Kemp Smith\, and later strongly endorsed (both interpretatively and philosophically) by Barry Stroud\, Peter Strawson\, and many others &ndash\; views Hume&rsquo\;s naturalism as providing some general response\, or even a resolution\, to the sceptical problems that he raises. &nbsp\;Here I want to challenge this sort of narrative\, by drawing distinctions within both naturalism and scepticism\, and showing how Hume&rsquo\;s responses to his most prominent philosophical challenges are importantly different\, while the idea that he employs a consistent &ldquo\;naturalist&rdquo\; strategy to address them is also misguided when examined in detail. &nbsp\;The results are relevant not only to Hume interpretation\, but also to the issues that Hume discusses.</p>
ORGANIZER;CN=Sandra Leonie Field:
METHOD:PUBLISH
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR