BEGIN:VCALENDAR
PRODID:-//Grails iCalendar plugin//NONSGML Grails iCalendar plugin//EN
VERSION:2.0
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20260417T080546Z
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Belgrade:20131107T100000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Belgrade:20131107T120000
SUMMARY:Locality and the Common Cause Principle
UID:20260417T175645Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-f5d4878dd-g4ggw
TZID:Europe/Belgrade
LOCATION:Belgrade\, Serbia
DESCRIPTION:<p>Faculty of Philosophy (Philosophical Society room - 2nd floor)\, University of Belgrade</p>\n\n<p><br></p>\n\n<p>G&aacute\;bor Szab&oacute\;</p>\n\n<p>Institute of Philosophy</p>\n\n<p>Research Center for the Humanities</p>\n\n<p>Hungarian Academy of Sciences</p>\n\n\n\n<p>&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\; <strong><em>&nbsp\;Locality</em></strong> <strong><em>and the Common Cause Principle</em></strong><br> <br> <br> </p>\n<p>Reichenbach's Common Cause Principle claims that correlations between<br> causally non-related events should be traced back to a common cause which is usually characterized probabilistically and localized spatiotemporally. But what is the exact relation between the probabilistic characterization and spatiotemporal localization? Intuitively\, common causes should be accommodated in the strong past\, that is in the intersection of the causal past of the correlating events\, but the axiomatics of algebraic quantum field theory\, for example\, seems to suggest that they should be in a broader region: in the weak past\, that is in the union of the causal pasts. How these localizations relate to each other in the classical and in the quantum theory\, and how they relate to Bell's notion of local causality<strong><em> </em></strong>characterized in probabilistic terms---these are the questions the paper is addressing.</p>\n<p><br>Slobodan Perovic perovic.slobodan@gmail.com</p>
ORGANIZER:
METHOD:PUBLISH
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR