BEGIN:VCALENDAR
PRODID:-//Grails iCalendar plugin//NONSGML Grails iCalendar plugin//EN
VERSION:2.0
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20260316T025740Z
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Berlin:20240815T230000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Berlin:20240815T230000
SUMMARY:Lund Early-Career Conference: The Language of Moral Repair
UID:20260317T124248Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@fe80:0:0:0:8c16:90ff:fea7:70aa%3
TZID:Europe/Berlin
LOCATION:LUX\, Helgonavägen 3\, Lund\, Sweden
DESCRIPTION:<p><strong>CFP: 3rd Annual Lund-Early Career Conference: &ldquo\;The Language of Moral Repair&rdquo\;</strong></p>\n<p>The Lund Early-Career Conference is a forum dedicated to forging connections between research and researchers in selected topics from both theoretical and practical philosophy. The conference is aimed at Ph.D.-candidates and early-career researchers working in philosophy or related fields\, such as psychology or cognitive science\, relevant for the theme of the conference.</p>\n<p>Each year we select a theme based on topics of interest from within the subdivisions of the Lund Philosophical department (Theoretical Philosophy and Practical Philosophy) with the goal of finding under-explored connections ripe for interdisciplinary investigation. This year we&rsquo\;ve chosen the theme &lsquo\;The Language of Moral Repair&rsquo\;\, broadly construed\, with the aim of bringing together ethicists\, philosophers of language or mind\, and philosophers of emotion to tackle questions of how these topics are related to each other.</p>\n<p>Dates: 22nd - 23rd of November\, 2024</p>\n<p>Keynote speaker: Lucy McDonald\, King's College London</p>\n<p>All speakers will be given a 45 minute slot for a presentation followed by a 45 minute Q&amp\;A session beginning with questions and remarks from an assigned commentator.</p>\n<p>All submissions should be prepared for blind review and should include a separate document containing the following information: your name\, paper title\, institutional affiliation\, e-mail address\, and phone number. The initial submission should consist of an extended abstract (1000 words maximum) for a paper suitable for the presentational format (4000 - 5000 words). The paper should be submitted upon notification of acceptance as a speaker.</p>\n<p><strong>Submission deadline: August 15th\, 2024.</strong></p>\n<p><strong>Notification of acceptance: August 31st\, 2024.</strong></p>\n<p>Please submit papers via e-mail with &ldquo\;2024 Conference Submission&rdquo\; in the subject line to niklas.dahl@fil.lu.se.</p>\n<p>As a guide to what kind of contributions would be relevant\, we&rsquo\;ve distinguished some suggested topic. These are intended as guidelines and other interesting proposals related to the theme are also welcome.</p>\n<ul>\n<li>What kind of speech act is an apology?</li>\n</ul>\n<ul>\n<li>Are the rules governing apologies constitutive or regulative\; is a defective apology still an apology?</li>\n</ul>\n<ul>\n<li>What are the felicity conditions for the successful performance of speech acts aimed at moral repair?</li>\n</ul>\n<ul>\n<li>To what extent is moral repair something accomplished through singular speech acts versus extended conversational exchanges?</li>\n</ul>\n<ul>\n<li>In the context of moral repair\, what categorisation of speech acts do expressions such as 'I apologise' and 'You are forgiven' belong to\, and what is their significance?</li>\n</ul>\n<ul>\n<li>To what extent is the recipient's uptake essential to apology and forgiveness\, and how does it influence the success of these speech acts?</li>\n</ul>\n<ul>\n<li>What constitutes the successful restoration of a moral relationship\, and how can this be assessed linguistically and contextually?</li>\n</ul>\n<ul>\n<li>How do established conventions and cultural norms shape the discourse and practice of moral repair?</li>\n</ul>\n<ul>\n<li>What role does the interplay between speaker intentionality and audience interpretation play in the effectiveness of moral repair speech acts?</li>\n</ul>\n<ul>\n<li>How do non-verbal cues and contextual factors complement verbal apologies and forgiveness and contribute to the overall process of moral repair?</li>\n</ul>\n<ul>\n<li>What ethical considerations and dilemmas arise in the practice of verbal moral repair\, especially in contexts of significant harm or injustice?</li>\n</ul>\n<ul>\n<li>How do contemporary linguistic theories and philosophical discourses address the limitations and challenges of verbal moral repair in achieving reconciliation and reparation?</li>\n</ul>
ORGANIZER:
METHOD:PUBLISH
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR
