BEGIN:VCALENDAR
PRODID:-//Grails iCalendar plugin//NONSGML Grails iCalendar plugin//EN
VERSION:2.0
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20260618T183307Z
DTSTART;TZID=Australia/Sydney:20240814T100000
DTEND;TZID=Australia/Sydney:20240815T170000
SUMMARY:Epistemic Accountability
UID:20260619T073022Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-bd7db559-gt5qm
TZID:Australia/Sydney
LOCATION:10 Grafton St\, Chippendale\, Sydney\, Australia\, 2006
DESCRIPTION:<p>The &lsquo\;social turn&rsquo\; in epistemology has seen a recent explosion of work from philosophers investigating epistemic analogues of what we might call our &lsquo\;accountability practices&rsquo\;: holding responsible\, blaming\, praising\, excusing\, exempting\, forgiving\, reconciling\, and atoning\, among other things\, which have traditionally been thought of in primarily moral terms. This workshop aims to bring together philosophers working at the intersection of moral psychology\, responsibility\, and epistemology\, to investigate such practices and their foundations.</p>\n<p>The two-day workshop will take place in person in Sydney on August 14 and 15 at The University of Notre Dame\, Australia&rsquo\;s Broadway campus. Registration is free.<br><br>Attendees now also have the option to attend online. To register for either in-person or online attendance\, please email&nbsp\;<u>adam.piovarchy@nd.edu.au</u>&nbsp\;</p>\n<p>&nbsp\; Potential topics include\, but are not limited to:</p>\n<ul>\n<li>When are people\, group agents\, or collectives responsible\, blameworthy\, praiseworthy\, or excused for their epistemic conduct? What kinds of responses to epistemic conduct are warranted? How can this be done well or poorly?</li>\n<li>Is 'epistemic accountability' ultimately reducible to moral accountability?</li>\n<li>How are epistemic norms similar to\, different from\, or related to\, moral norms? Does epistemic normativity have a social basis?</li>\n<li>Is the notion of &lsquo\;epistemic [x]&rsquo\; confused? Should we be sceptical of such proposals?</li>\n<li>How should we theorise about epistemic agents\, networks\, groups\, or epistemology more broadly when asking such questions?</li>\n</ul>\n<p>&nbsp\; Speakers and Schedule (AEST) &nbsp\;</p>\n<p><strong>Wednesday 14 August</strong> &nbsp\;</p>\n<p>10:00am&ensp\;&ensp\;&ensp\;&ensp\;&ensp\;<em>Coffee&nbsp\;</em>&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\; Welcome &ndash\; Adam Piovarchy &amp\; Tim Smartt (IES)</p>\n<p>10:30am&ensp\;&ensp\;&ensp\;&ensp\;&ensp\;<u>Hannah Tierney</u>&nbsp\;(UC Davis): &lsquo\;Is elective epistemic forgiveness possible?&rsquo\;</p>\n<p>11:30am<em>&ensp\;&ensp\;&ensp\;&ensp\;&ensp\;</em><u>Mark Colyvan</u>&nbsp\;(Sydney): &lsquo\;Epistemic Crimes and Misdemeanors: A Game-Theoretic Perspective on Violating Epistemic Norms&rsquo\;</p>\n<p>12:30pm&ensp\;&ensp\;&ensp\;&ensp\;&ensp\;<em>Lunch</em></p>\n<p><em></em>1:30pm<em>&ensp\;&ensp\;&ensp\;&ensp\;&ensp\;&ensp\;</em><u>Kendra Chilson</u>&nbsp\;(UC Riverside): &lsquo\;The Objective Attitude Towards Disabled People as Epistemic Silencing&rsquo\;&nbsp\;[online]</p>\n<p>2:30pm<em>&ensp\;&ensp\;&ensp\;&ensp\;&ensp\;&ensp\;</em><u>Mark Alfano</u>&nbsp\;(Macquarie): &lsquo\;Trust from Mistrust&rsquo\;&nbsp\; &nbsp\; &nbsp\;&nbsp\; &nbsp\;</p>\n<p>3:30pm&ensp\;&ensp\;&ensp\;&ensp\;&ensp\;&ensp\;<em>Coffee</em></p>\n<p><em></em>4:00pm<em>&ensp\;&ensp\;&ensp\;&ensp\;&ensp\;&ensp\;</em><u>Roman Heil</u>&nbsp\;(Goethe University Frankfurt): &lsquo\;Epistemic Blame and Non-punitive Sanctions&rsquo\; [online]</p>\n<p>5:00pm&ensp\;&ensp\;&ensp\;&ensp\;&ensp\;&ensp\;Close&nbsp\; &nbsp\; &nbsp\;</p>\n<p><strong><br></strong></p>\n<p><strong>Thursday 15 August</strong></p>\n<p>10:00am&ensp\;&ensp\;&ensp\;&ensp\;&ensp\;<em>Coffee</em></p>\n<p><em></em>10:30am&ensp\;&ensp\;&ensp\;&ensp\;&ensp\;<u>Cameron Boult</u>&nbsp\;(Brandon/Johannesburg): 'Epistemic Blame\, Reparations\, and Our Relations as Knowers&rsquo\;</p>\n<p>11:30am<em>&ensp\;&ensp\;&ensp\;&ensp\;&ensp\;</em><u>Beba Cibralic</u>&nbsp\;(Georgetown): &lsquo\;Epistemic Responsibility Gaps&rsquo\; [online]</p>\n<p>12:30pm&ensp\;&ensp\;&ensp\;&ensp\;&ensp\;<em>Lunch</em></p>\n<p><em></em>1:30pm<em>&ensp\;&ensp\;&ensp\;&ensp\;&ensp\;&ensp\;</em><u>Tim Smartt</u>&nbsp\;(IES): &lsquo\;More Scepticism about Epistemic Blame: A Reply to Boult&rsquo\;</p>\n<p>2:30pm<em>&ensp\;&ensp\;&ensp\;&ensp\;&ensp\;&ensp\;</em><u>Adam Piovarchy</u>&nbsp\;(IES): &lsquo\;Blame First\, Ask Epistemology Later&rsquo\;</p>\n<p>3:30pm&ensp\;&ensp\;&ensp\;&ensp\;&ensp\;&ensp\;<em>Coffee</em></p>\n<p><em></em>4:00pm<em>&ensp\;&ensp\;&ensp\;&ensp\;&ensp\;&ensp\;</em><u>Elise Woodard</u>&nbsp\;(KCL) &amp\;&nbsp\;<u>Michael Hannon</u>&nbsp\;(Nottingham): &lsquo\;The Construction of Epistemic Normativity&rsquo\; [online]</p>\n<p>5:00pm&ensp\;&ensp\;&ensp\;&ensp\;&ensp\;&ensp\;Close&nbsp\;&nbsp\;</p>\n<p>5:30pm&ensp\;&ensp\;&ensp\;&ensp\;&ensp\;&ensp\;Dinner at Baja Cantina\, Glebe. All welcome.</p>
ORGANIZER;CN=Adam Piovarchy:
METHOD:PUBLISH
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR
