BEGIN:VCALENDAR
PRODID:-//Grails iCalendar plugin//NONSGML Grails iCalendar plugin//EN
VERSION:2.0
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20260430T033700Z
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Tallinn:20241104T100000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Tallinn:20241106T170000
SUMMARY:Frege lectures 2024: Reasons for Action
UID:20260502T004229Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-6b96c54f56-bljdq
TZID:Europe/Tallinn
LOCATION:Jakobi 2\, Tartu\, Estonia
DESCRIPTION:<p>GOTTLOB FREGE LECTURES IN THEORETICAL PHILOSOPHY 2024: EMMA BORG (LONDON):&nbsp\; REASONS FOR ACTION</p>\n<p>Do people generally do what they do for the reasons they have? A standard answer in philosophy &ndash\; Common-sense or Folk Psychology &ndash\; says yes. But recently the idea that people are generally rational\, reasons-responsive creatures has come under significant pressure\, for a range of empirical findings (often generated within social\, comparative\, and developmental psychology) seem to show that\, on the contrary\, people are often reasons-blind\, behaving on the basis of gut-feels and intuitions\, and subject to numerous biases and other reasoning flaws. However\, although this empirical work is now extremely well-known (stretching beyond the ivory tower and into the public consciousness)\, I suggest that the precise problem for Common-sense Psychology remains unclear. For there are (at least) three different arguments that the empirical data could be used to support. In these lectures I clarify these three arguments and contend that\, for each one\, there are responses available to an advocate of the Common-sense view. My conclusion will be that the case against Common-sense Psychology can be rejected and that we should retain the idea that (typical adult human) action involves acting for reasons.</p>
ORGANIZER;CN="Bruno Mölder":
METHOD:PUBLISH
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR
