BEGIN:VCALENDAR
PRODID:-//Grails iCalendar plugin//NONSGML Grails iCalendar plugin//EN
VERSION:2.0
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20260421T201010Z
DTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:20241004T120000
DTEND;TZID=America/New_York:20241004T130000
SUMMARY:Tushar Menon - Scientific realism as a normative notion (twice over)
UID:20260424T081647Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-6b96c54f56-bljdq
TZID:America/New_York
LOCATION: University of Pittsburgh\, 4200 Fifth Avenue\, Pittsburgh\, United States\, 15260
DESCRIPTION:<p>The Center for Philosophy of Science at the University of Pittsburgh invites you to join us for our Lunch Time Talk.&nbsp\;Attend in person at 1117 Cathedral of Learning or visit our live stream on YouTube at&nbsp\;<a rel="noopenerdata-cke-saved-href="https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCrRp47ZMXD7NXO3a9Gyh2sg">https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCrRp47ZMXD7NXO3a9Gyh2sg</a>.</p>\n\n<p><strong>LTT: <a data-cke-saved-href="https://www.centerphilsci.pitt.edu/fellows/tushar-menon/">Tushar Menon</a></strong></p>\n<p>Friday\, October 4 @ 12:00 pm&nbsp\;-&nbsp\;1:30 pm&nbsp\;EDT</p>\n\n<p><strong>Title:</strong>&nbsp\;Scientific realism as a normative notion (twice over)</p>\n<p><strong>Abstract:</strong>&nbsp\;The semantic component of standard scientific realism&mdash\;sometimes called semantic realism&mdash\;is the view that the semantic treatment of scientific-theoretical terms should be the same as that of observational terms. This is to be understood\, roughly\, as the claim that theoretical claims are descriptive just as observational claims are. But standard semantic realism does not say anything about why we are right to treat observational claims as descriptive in the first place. In this talk\, I argue that the justification of the descriptive deployment of observational terms is best understood from a normative pragmatist perspective\, in terms of what we can use such discourse to do. I thus construe semantic realism as the claim that this is also the way to assess the correctness of the descriptive deployment of scientific-theoretical terms. I then argue that descriptive deployment is itself to be understood normatively\, in terms of a Sellars-Brandom-style inferentialism. The upshot is (i) that we can do much more justice to the impulses that motivate scientific realism\, and (ii) assess the relative merits of scientific realism across a wider domain of scientific theories (in particular mathematised physics) if we understand it in this doubly normative sense.</p>\n\n<p>This talk will also be available live streamed on:</p>\n<p>Zoom:&nbsp\;&nbsp\;<a rel="noopenerdata-cke-saved-href="https://pitt.zoom.us/s/93846460443">https://pitt.zoom.us/s/93846460443</a></p>\n<p>YouTube at&nbsp\;<a data-cke-saved-href="https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCrRp47ZMXD7NXO3a9Gyh2sg">https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCrRp47ZMXD7NXO3a9Gyh2sg</a>.</p>
ORGANIZER;CN=Edouard Machery:
METHOD:PUBLISH
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR
