BEGIN:VCALENDAR
PRODID:-//Grails iCalendar plugin//NONSGML Grails iCalendar plugin//EN
VERSION:2.0
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20260404T104337Z
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20250501T234500
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20250501T234500
SUMMARY:Nonsense in Language and Thought
UID:20260404T163841Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-f5d4878dd-4s97k
TZID:Europe/London
DESCRIPTION:<p><strong>Title:</strong></p>\n<p><em>Nonsense in Language and Thought</em></p>\n<p><strong>Guest editor:</strong></p>\n<p>Krystian Bogucki (Polish Academy of Sciences)</p>\n<p><strong>Journal:</strong></p>\n<p><em>Studia Semiotyczne (Semiotic Studies)</em></p>\n<p>http://studiasemiotyczne.pts.edu.pl/</p>\n<p><strong>Deadline for submissions:</strong></p>\n<p>the 1st of May 2025</p>\n<p><strong>Description</strong></p>\n<p><em>Studia Semiotyczne&nbsp\;</em><em>(Semiotic Studies)</em>&nbsp\;invites submissions for a special issue of the journal. Papers should be written in English and prepared for blind review.</p>\n<p>An interest in nonsense was a hallmark of the early analytic philosophy. Bertrand Russell (1908) thought that a theory of nonsense could help us avoid some daunting paradoxes in logic. Ludwig Wittgenstein (1922\, 1953) and Rudolf Carnap (1931) recognised nonsense as a fundamental concept for philosophical criticism. They claimed that much of philosophical discourse is defective in the most fundamental way: it is neither true nor false\, it does not consist of thoughts and propositions &ndash\; it is nonsense. According to the early Wittgenstein\, philosophers want to describe the nature of the world\, thought\, language and ethics\, but they unwittingly fall into nonsense. The&nbsp\;<em>Tractatus</em>&nbsp\;was supposed to free us from this troublesome position by presenting a perspicuous notation. On the other hand\, the later Wittgenstein claimed that we should compare deceptive philosophical images with our ordinary ways of thinking and speaking in order to avoid nonsense. Philosophical problems arise when language goes on holiday\, so we must always remember the everyday use of concepts. For Carnap\, propositions should be reducible to sense data and constructed according to the rules of logical syntax in order to be meaningful.</p>\n<p>Later\, the topic of nonsense was discussed by Alfred Ayer\, Gilbert Ryle\, Willard V. O. Quine\, Arthur Prior\, Richard Routley and Georg H. von Wright\, among others. Since the late 1970s\, however\, the interest in nonsense has faded. Only recently\, some important works have been published. The first important stimulus came from foundational works on theories of nonsense (Cappelen 2012\, 2013\; Camp 2004\; Glock 2015\; Magidor 2009\, 2013). The second source of the revival of interest in nonsense was Wittgenstein scholarship on the austere and substantial conceptions of nonsense (Conant 2001\; Diamond 1995\, 2005\; Glock 2004\; Hacker 2003\; Moore 2003\; Sullivan 2003). Some works also examined the relation of nonsense to other phenomena (Gotham 2017\, Keller and Keller 2021\, Shaw 2015\, Sorensen 2003).</p>\n<p>The important questions to be addressed in the forthcoming volume are (to name but a few): What are the sources of nonsense? Are some parts of philosophical and non-philosophical discourse nonsense? What is the relation between nonsense and figurative speech? Is it at all possible to be wrong whether our own thoughts are meaningful? We hope that the special issue of&nbsp\;<em>Studia Semiotyczne</em>&nbsp\;will further strengthen and deepen the scholarly interest in nonsense.</p>\n<p>Possible topics include\, but are not limited to:</p>\n<p>Theories of nonsense</p>\n<p>Nonsense and logical syntax</p>\n<p>Nonsense and category mistakes</p>\n<p>Nonsense and figurative speech (e.g. metaphor\, metonymy)</p>\n<p>Nonsense and fiction</p>\n<p>History of the concept of nonsense (in particular Wittgenstein's and the Vienna Circle's views on nonsense)</p>\n<p>Nonsense and understanding</p>\n<p>Nonsense and illusions of sense</p>\n<p>Nonsense and quantification</p>\n<p>Nonsense and linguistics</p>\n<p>Nonsense and ineffability</p>\n<p>Nonsense\, knowledge-how and knowledge-that</p>\n<p>Logics of nonsense</p>\n<p>Nonsense and semantic paradoxes</p>\n<p>How to diagnose philosophical nonsense?</p>\n<p>Metaphilosophical and methodological issues concerning nonsense</p>\n<p>In order to submit the paper\, one is kindly asked to submit the manuscript by sending it to:</p>\n<p>krystian.bogucki@ifispan.edu.pl&nbsp\;and&nbsp\;studiasemiotyczne@pts.edu.pl</p>\n<p>All submitted papers will be double-blind peer-reviewed.</p>\n<p><br><br></p>\n<p>About the journal:</p>\n<p><em>Studia Semiotyczne</em>&nbsp\;(<em>Semiotic Studies</em>) is a journal founded in 1970 by Jerzy Pelc\, its editor-in-chief until 2015. Between 1970 and 2015\,&nbsp\;<em>Studia Semiotyczne</em>&nbsp\;was published non-periodically (during that period\, 29 volumes were published). In December 2015\,&nbsp\;<em>Studia Semiotyczne</em>&nbsp\;was transformed into a six-monthly print and Internet publication. Papers accepted for publication in the journal revolve around various aspects of semiotics (conceived in the Morris-Carnap sense) and philosophy. Papers submitted as articles are subject to a double-blind peer review.&nbsp\;<em>Studia Semiotyczne</em>&nbsp\;is an open-access journal published by The Polish Semiotic Society (Polskie Towarzystwo Semiotyczne).</p>\n<p>The journal is present in&nbsp\;Academica\,&nbsp\;BazHum<a name="m_7071652518928126170__Hlt129195539"></a><a name="m_7071652518928126170__Hlt129195540"></a>\,&nbsp\;CEEOL\,&nbsp\;CEJSH\,&nbsp\;DOAJ\, EBSCO Discovery Service\,&nbsp\;ERIH Plus<a name="m_7071652518928126170__Hlt129195509"></a><a name="m_7071652518928126170__Hlt129195510"></a><a name="m_7071652518928126170__Hlt129195520"></a><a name="m_7071652518928126170__Hlt129195521"></a>\,&nbsp\;Index Copernicus\,&nbsp\;Library of Science\, Philosopher&rsquo\;s Index\,&nbsp\;PhilPapers\,&nbsp\;Polona<a name="m_7071652518928126170__Hlt129195407"></a><a name="m_7071652518928126170__Hlt129195408"></a>\,&nbsp\;Scopus&nbsp\;<a name="m_7071652518928126170__Hlt129195491"></a><a name="m_7071652518928126170__Hlt129195492"></a>and Web of Science. The journal is also ranked by the following national agencies for scholarly evaluation:</p>\n<p>- ANVUR (Italy): both as a scientific journal and as an A-Class (area 11)\,</p>\n<p>- MEiN (Poland).</p>\n
ORGANIZER:
METHOD:PUBLISH
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR
