BEGIN:VCALENDAR
PRODID:-//Grails iCalendar plugin//NONSGML Grails iCalendar plugin//EN
VERSION:2.0
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20260526T090329Z
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20250117T090000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20250117T090000
SUMMARY:Psychiatric Diagnosis – Empirical and Philosophical Perspectives
UID:20260530T025206Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-6b96c54f56-bljdq
TZID:Europe/London
DESCRIPTION:<p>Venue: Online<br>There is no conference fee.<br>Important Dates:<br>Abstract Submission Deadline: 17. 01. 2025<br>Notification Date: 31. 01. 2025<br>Workshop Date: 21. 2. 2025<br>Psychiatric and psychological diagnosis is an increasingly frequent<br>component of social life and a subject of analysis in social sciences and<br>philosophy. The role of diagnosis in the scientific as well as therapeutic<br>discourse requires a consideration of its practices as well as its theoretical<br>foundations\, combining empirical\, analytical and normative approaches.<br>This workshop aims to create an interdisciplinary scientific discussion in<br>which the various facets of diagnosis form the leading motif. We invite<br>social scientists\, especially anthropologists and sociologists focusing on<br>field research and critical discourse analysis\, and philosophers\, examining<br>the foundations of psychiatric diagnosis with ethical and epistemological<br>normative frameworks.<br>A particularly relevant philosophical framework presents itself in the<br>theory of hermeneutical injustice. This approach analyzes harm stemming<br>from deficient interpretive resources\, a category arguably applicable to<br>psychiatric diagnosis. This closely relates to the fact that diagnosis can<br>also be a process in which new empirical and identity qualities are<br>conceptualized. The process is embedded in institutional\, economic\, and<br>social conditions\, the influence of which has a direct impact on an<br>individual's experiences.Diagnosis is also a practice that actively shapes expert and non-expert<br>discourses\, and also creates a field for their mutual interaction. It provides<br>an opportunity for new interpretations of oneself in expert discourse<br>through the non-expert practice of self-diagnosis. In an era when diagnosis<br>and its language are penetrating social interpretative resources\, new fields<br>of scientific consideration are opening up for philosophy and the social<br>sciences.<br>We invite submissions on questions as\, but not limited to the following:<br>- When does a psychiatric diagnosis properly fulfill its interpretative role<br>and how can it be empirically examined?<br>- How do economic\, political\, and institutional factors shape the diagnostic<br>process?<br>- What types of diagnoses and diagnostic practices are particularly<br>concerning from an ethical perspective and for what reasons?<br>- How does the process of self-diagnosis formulate\, work and lead to<br>identification with particular condition?<br>- How are diagnostic concepts received by the wider society and what are<br>the consequences for their interpretive power and the self-awareness of<br>individuals who identify with the concept?<br>- How does diagnosis affect the experience of the individual\, their ecology<br>and everyday environment?<br>- How are psychiatric diagnoses linked to broader hermeneutical gaps and<br>social marginalisation?<br>Please send your abstract\, no longer than 500 words and prepared for<br>blind review\, to psydia.conference@gmail.com. Use the subject line<br>PSY-DIAG and include your name and affiliation in the email body.<br>Organizing Team:<br>Christoph Merdes\, Interdisciplinary Centre for Ethics\, Jagiellonian<br>UniversityNatalia Filar\, Institute of Archaeology and Ethnology of the Polish Academy<br>of Sciences</p>
ORGANIZER;CN=Christoph J Merdes:
METHOD:PUBLISH
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR
