BEGIN:VCALENDAR
PRODID:-//Grails iCalendar plugin//NONSGML Grails iCalendar plugin//EN
VERSION:2.0
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20260924T035958Z
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20120123T090000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20120123T090000
SUMMARY:Philosophy of Management
UID:20260924T035958Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@fe80:0:0:0:700d:17ff:fe6b:a9eb%3
TZID:Europe/London
LOCATION:Oxford\, United Kingdom
DESCRIPTION:<p>Philosophy of Management 2012 is the eighth in a series of conferences open to all. &nbsp\;It will be of special interest to philosophers\, management researchers and teachers\, consultants and practising managers.<br> <br> Following the established model at St Anne's College we are designing an event to offer opportunities for unhurried presentation of papers and discussion\, high-quality supportive interaction and feedback\, ample opportunity for networking and a gathering in which all participants can pursue informal\, rich conversations and the continuing exploration of shared concerns. Participants will be limited to 75 plus plenary speakers.</p>\n<p>Contributions are invited to any of the Conference tracks - or on any aspect&nbsp\;of philosophy of management and from within any cultural or philosophical&nbsp\;tradition. We will especially welcome papers\, panels and workshops on the&nbsp\;relationship between philosophy and management practice.<br><br><strong>Publication</strong><br><br>Papers will be blind-reviewed\, appear on the Conference Papers website and&nbsp\;revised versions will be considered for publication in a forthcoming issue&nbsp\;of Philosophy of Management.<br><br><strong>Tracks</strong><br><br>Papers combining empirical research and case studies with philosophical&nbsp\;treatment of issues will be particularly welcome in all tracks.<br><br>1. &nbsp\;Is "Sustainability" Sustainable?<br>Track convenor: Wim Vandekerckhove<br><br>Sustainability has become a household name. The discourses of carbon&nbsp\;emissions and climate change have rendered it urgent such that 'sustainable'&nbsp\;is now a must for everything we do or plan. Perhaps paradoxically it has&nbsp\;become a driver for organisational change far beyond the domain of&nbsp\;ecological sustainability. This track welcomes papers that critically examine the various practices&nbsp\;justified through the concept of sustainability. Welcomed contributions&nbsp\;could cover the following:</p>\n<ul>\n<li>How far can we stretch the concept? What could it mean that it does&nbsp\;not yet mean? What does it mean now that it used not to mean?</li>\n<li>Does 'sustainable' add anything previous denominators lacked?</li>\n<li>Are some sustainable practices unethical?</li>\n<li>Is there such a thing as 'sustainable human resources management'?</li>\n<li>What does financial sustainability tell us about reward management?</li>\n<li>How has the notion of sustainability reshaped the distribution of&nbsp\;responsibilities between State\, corporations\, and citizens?</li>\n<li>Is there a totalitarian tendency in sustainability? Can we afford to&nbsp\;say or do the unsustainable?</li>\n<li>Is sustainable management utopian?</li>\n</ul>\n<p>2. &nbsp\;Wisdom in Management<br>Track convenors: Steven Gold and Bernard McKenna (Professor of Management&nbsp\;University of Queensland)<br><br>Wisdom has not recently been a significant area of interest for&nbsp\;philosophers\, but oddly it has received serious attention in the disciplines&nbsp\;of psychology and management. &nbsp\;Since these are applied fields of study with&nbsp\;practical implications defining what wisdom is\, operationalizing it\,&nbsp\;measuring it\, and applying it presents a wide array of interesting problems.&nbsp\;This track opens the topic of wisdom up from the purely theoretical to the&nbsp\;applied. Topics of interest might include:</p>\n<ul>\n<li>Whose wisdom? In the Western tradition\, Aristotle and the Christian&nbsp\;tradition from the Old Testament to Aquinas dominate the philosophical&nbsp\;tradition. How do they differ? What do "Eastern" and Indigenous cultures&nbsp\;have to say?</li>\n<li>Building communities of wisdom: As wisdom emerges from tradition and&nbsp\;practice\, is it possible to overcome the ephemera\, individualism\, and&nbsp\;narcissism that dominates much of popular culture?</li>\n<li>Prudence is regarded as a crucial element of wisdom: why was it so&nbsp\;lacking in the behaviour of corporations and governments in economic and&nbsp\;financial policy and practice?</li>\n<li>Can we teach or teach for wisdom?</li>\n<li>Ancient western philosophy and modern psychological theorists agree&nbsp\;that virtue is core to wisdom. What do we mean by virtue?</li>\n<li>The search for meaning. How can we get beyond the meaning-of-life&nbsp\;fads to talk about meaningfulness?</li>\n<li>What does wisdom have to say about sustainability? Aristotelian&nbsp\;wisdom is built on the notion of eudaimonia (the good life): how can wisdom&nbsp\;show us the principles of a sustainable good life?</li>\n<li>Wisdom requires intelligence and knowledge. What sorts of&nbsp\;intelligence and knowledge produces wisdom?</li>\n<li>Psychologists have attempted to operationalize and measure wisdom&nbsp\;using implicit (e.g.\, Sternberg\, Ardelt\, Webster) and explicit theories of&nbsp\;wisdom (Baltes\, Staudinger). &nbsp\;Is wisdom so ineffable as to be beyond&nbsp\;measurement?</li>\n</ul>\n<p>3. &nbsp\;Legitimacy and Management<br>Track convenor: Miriam Green<br><br>Management and its role has been a subject of interest at least since Berle&nbsp\;and Means' The Modern Corporation and Private Property (1932). &nbsp\; In recent&nbsp\;decades managers have been working in a context where the market and market&nbsp\;values have acquired dominance in public as well as private organisations\;&nbsp\;where bureaucratic structures have been weakened in favour of more&nbsp\;flexibility and freedom for managers\; where corporations have increased&nbsp\;their power nationally and internationally and have developed strong&nbsp\;corporate cultures internally\; and where inequalities in wealth and power&nbsp\;among managers and others have increased exponentially.<br><br>This raises questions surrounding the long-standing question of management&nbsp\;legitimacy\, specifically about managerial values\, goals and practices\, the&nbsp\;character of a good manager\, how we should judge managers\, the legitimacy of&nbsp\;their roles and the future of management itself.<br><br>Contributions are welcomed and could include the following topics::</p>\n<ul>\n<li>Manager and management identities</li>\n<li>Virtue ethics in relation to managers</li>\n<li>The accountability of managers - to whom?</li>\n<li>The legitimacy of management</li>\n<li>Managers in strong corporate cultures - their loyalties\, values and&nbsp\;practices</li>\n<li>Whistleblowing - by managers and regarding managers</li>\n<li>Bureaucratic vs flexible organisation structures and the effects of&nbsp\;the weakening of bureaucratic principles in many organisations on&nbsp\;conceptions of managerial ethics</li>\n<li>Remuneration for managers - how do we judge what is acceptable?</li>\n<li>Management and other stakeholders - which other stakeholders should&nbsp\;be catered for to ensure legitimacy?</li>\n<li>Management theory and its interpretations and applications by&nbsp\;managers: successes and failures</li>\n<li>The future of management</li>\n<li>The Management Oath</li>\n</ul>\n<p>4. &nbsp\; On the Possibility of a Public Sector Management Philosophy<br>Track convenor: Paul Griseri<br><br>Over the last couple of decades there has been an increasing trend for&nbsp\;public sector management to draw from private sector models. The sloganised&nbsp\;idea of a 'New' Public Management based on emulation of private sector&nbsp\;practices has become an orthodoxy. Privatisation\, and its cognates such as&nbsp\;internal markets for service provision\, have led to a gradual diminishing of&nbsp\;the concept of public service as a value in its own right. Management&nbsp\;approaches such as performance measurement\, developed for the management of&nbsp\;companies\, and more specifically finding their most clear application to&nbsp\;activities such as manufacturing\, are applied in the complex arena of public&nbsp\;service provision.<br><br>Underlying this is the belief that an organisation that is structured and&nbsp\;intended to provide a public service may be compared directly in terms of&nbsp\;its basic operational drivers with one that is structured and intended to&nbsp\;generate profits for its owners and/or shareholders. There are however&nbsp\;drawbacks to this - the hierarchy of financial ratios\, for example\, that&nbsp\;provides an elegant means of evaluating the overall performance of a company\, has no simple analogue for\, say\, an education or social welfare&nbsp\;function of government. &nbsp\;Simply put\, the oil that greases a company's cogs&nbsp\;and wheels is profit - all and any activity may be assessed in terms of what&nbsp\;it might add to the bottom line\, whether such activities be directly linked&nbsp\;to costs and sales\, or are more remote areas such as CSR programmes or brand&nbsp\;recognition initiatives. &nbsp\;No such financially founded lubricant exists in a&nbsp\;parallel manner for the public sector.<br><br>One basic question\, therefore\, underlying this track is how far might a&nbsp\;modelling of the public sector on the private be appropriate. &nbsp\;The New&nbsp\;Public Management has\, arguably\, grown old\, and the plight of many&nbsp\;governments in 2011 suggests that it has not achieved its stated aims in any&nbsp\;case. Therefore\, it is necessary to return to the question of what models&nbsp\;successfully capture the several key features of the public sector\, such as&nbsp\;the idea of public accountability\, the acquisition and use of resources\, the&nbsp\;ideal of public service\, and the relation between the public sector and&nbsp\;other\, non-governmental not-for-profit organisations.<br><br>A further issue is the division between public and private sector&nbsp\;activities. &nbsp\;During the Keynesian era\, it was common for developed economies&nbsp\;to have a significant degree of publicly-owned enterprise\, in the form of state airlines\, state corporations involved in mining and extraction\, state&nbsp\;retail banking. Whilst this has not disappeared\, it has diminished\, driven&nbsp\;by a reduced idea of the state as providing solely the infrastructure and&nbsp\;frameworks for other economically valuable activities to be conducted via&nbsp\;markets.<br><br>Papers are therefore welcomed that address questions such as the following:</p>\n<ul>\n<li>What is the nature of 'public service'?</li>\n<li>How can performance against resource and financial imperatives be&nbsp\;meaningfully compared to impact on social needs and benefits?</li>\n<li>Where should the lines be drawn between public and private economic&nbsp\;activity?</li>\n<li>How far can the financial conception of a company provide a basis&nbsp\;for evaluating public sector activities?</li>\n<li>To what extent can there be a conception of public sector management&nbsp\;that persists beyond the immediate circumstances and interests of&nbsp\;governments\, citizens and enterprises?</li>\n<li>In the light of the current crises of economic debt attending much&nbsp\;of the developed world\, how far can and should the state support private&nbsp\;enterprise when it is failing?</li>\n</ul>\n<p>5. &nbsp\;Moving Philosophy of Management into the Management Curriculum Track<br>convenor: Nigel Laurie<br><br>If philosophy of management is to inform management practice then it needs&nbsp\;to shape management education. &nbsp\;This track invites theoretical and empirical&nbsp\;contributions on the relationship between philosophy of management as a&nbsp\;field of study and as a subject in the management curriculum. &nbsp\;Contributions&nbsp\;on any aspect will be welcomed including the following:</p>\n<ul>\n<li>Arguments for and against including philosophy of management in the&nbsp\;management curriculum</li>\n<li>Reviews of issues and case histories relating to acceptance of&nbsp\;philosophy of management as a subject for managers at undergraduate and&nbsp\;graduate levels</li>\n<li>Curriculum design: examples of philosophy of management programmes\,&nbsp\;philosophical components in other subjects programmes\, materials and&nbsp\;teaching methods</li>\n<li>Evaluations of existing teaching programmes</li>\n<li>Explorations of relationships between philosophy of management and&nbsp\;other management subjects</li>\n<li>Discussion of the relationship between philosophy of management and&nbsp\;business ethics</li>\n<li>Approaches to\, and techniques for\, developing philosophical skills&nbsp\;in non-philosophers</li>\n<li>The identification and preparation of &nbsp\;qualified teachers in&nbsp\;management schools</li>\n</ul>\n<p>6. &nbsp\;'Divers'<br><br>As in French academic conferences\, the 'divers' track is reserved for papers&nbsp\;on any other aspect of philosophy of management and they will be very&nbsp\;welcome.<br><br><strong>Conference format</strong></p>\n<ul>\n<li>Plenary session with invited leading speakers</li>\n<li>Presentations of papers in parallel sessions</li>\n<li>Workshops\, panel discussions and interviews</li>\n<li>Poster presentations</li>\n</ul>\n<p>We invite participants to propose collaborative formats for their sessions:&nbsp\;eg paper\, prepared reply and moderated discussion\; contrasting approaches to&nbsp\;an issue with papers from theorists and practitioners. Contributors are&nbsp\;welcome to assemble small panels to offer a series of linked papers.<br><br><strong>Language</strong><br><br>The language of the conference will be English.<br><br><strong>To contribute</strong><br><br>Please submit a 500 word abstract proposal with contact details and brief cv<br>all in one WORD (or equivalent) file to arrive by Monday 9 January 2012.<br>(Please do not submit full length papers at this stage.)<br><br>Please indicate the track to which you wish to contribute.<br><br>Please name your file as follows: &nbsp\; (yoursurname-papertitle).doc<br>Eg &nbsp\; McKenna-WisdomInManagement.doc<br><br>Email to &nbsp\;&nbsp\;<a href="mailto:nwltempemail-conference2012@yahoo.co.uk">nwltempemail-conference2012@yahoo.co.uk</a><br><br>Papers will be double-blind peer reviewed.<br><strong><br>Timetable</strong><br><br>23 January &nbsp\; &nbsp\;Proposal abstracts due<br>30 January &nbsp\; &nbsp\;Contributors informed of acceptance<br>30 March &nbsp\; &nbsp\; &nbsp\; Full papers due<br>11 May &nbsp\; &nbsp\; &nbsp\; &nbsp\; &nbsp\;Notification of conference tracks<br>22 June &nbsp\; &nbsp\; &nbsp\; &nbsp\; Issue of conference programme and full set of abstracts to&nbsp\;all participants<br>19 - 22 July &nbsp\; Conference<br><br>Please note that the texts of all papers will be available before the&nbsp\;conference on the conference papers website. &nbsp\;Speakers will speak to their&nbsp\;abstracts which will be issued by email on 22 June.</p>
ORGANIZER:
METHOD:PUBLISH
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR
