BEGIN:VCALENDAR
PRODID:-//Grails iCalendar plugin//NONSGML Grails iCalendar plugin//EN
VERSION:2.0
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20260605T213340Z
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Berlin:20140424T120000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Berlin:20140425T130000
SUMMARY:Workshop on Acquaintance
UID:20260610T011429Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-bd7db559-gt5qm
TZID:Europe/Berlin
LOCATION:Trondheim\, Norway
DESCRIPTION:<p>Acquaintance Workshop at Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU) Trondheim\, Norway\, 24th-25th April 2014 <em>Keynote speakers</em>: John Campbell (UC Berkeley)\, Bill Brewer (KCL) <em>speakers from project group</em>(provisional): Thomas Raleigh (NTNU)\, Jonathan Knowles (NTNU)\, Anders Nes (CSMN Oslo)\, Jessica Pepp (CSMN Oslo)\, Solveig Aasen (CSMN Oslo/UCL).</p>\n<p>Having fallen out of favour during the latter part of the 20th century\, the notion of <em>acquaintance</em> seems recently to be enjoying a revival of fortunes in philosophy. In the philosophy of perception\, na&iuml\;ve realists have claimed that we are consciously acquainted with external features in our environments. A number of theorists\, both physicalists and non-physicalists\, working on the &lsquo\;hard problem&rsquo\; of consciousness have appealed to the idea that we are acquainted with the phenomenal properties of experience. Some kind of acquaintance relation is also often adduced as a necessary condition for singular thought. Finally\, acquaintance features in some recent epistemological debates about the nature of self-knowledge.</p>\n<p>Of course\, as ever in philosophy\, there is much disagreement over the nature of acquaintance. Is acquaintance a non-representational relation or is it just a special kind of representation? Is acquaintance in itself a form of knowledge\, as Russell originally held\, or does it enable knowledge? If the latter\, does it enable a special kind of knowledge? Is acquaintance a &lsquo\;brute&rsquo\; relation between subject and object or can more be said about it? Is appealing to an acquaintance relation acceptable for physicalists? Is any notion of acquaintance bound to be a form of the &lsquo\;Myth of the Given&rsquo\;?</p>\n<p>This workshop aims to cast some light on some of these issues as well exploring the motivations for and possible arguments against the various acquaintance-based theories.</p>\n<p>Organised by <em>Representationalism or Anti-representationalism? Perspectives on Intentionality from Philosophy and Cognitive Science</em>\, see <a href="http://www.ntnu.no/ifr/representationalism-or-anti-representationalism">http://www.ntnu.no/ifr/representationalism-or-anti-representationalism</a>.</p>\n<p>If you wish to attend the workshop please contact <a href="mailto:jonathan.knowles@ntnu.no">jonathan.knowles@ntnu.no</a> or <a href="mailto:thomas.raleigh@ntnu.no">thomas.raleigh@ntnu.no</a>. Norwegian master students can apply for a stipend to support travel/accommodation.</p>
ORGANIZER;CN=Jonathan Knowles;CN=Thomas Raleigh:
METHOD:PUBLISH
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR
