BEGIN:VCALENDAR
PRODID:-//Grails iCalendar plugin//NONSGML Grails iCalendar plugin//EN
VERSION:2.0
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20260409T120412Z
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20250326T180000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20250326T193000
SUMMARY:The Inescapability of What? Kant’s New Take on Constitutivism
UID:20260411T130046Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-f5d4878dd-r5qzs
TZID:Europe/London
DESCRIPTION:The&nbsp\;<a target="_blank">Digital Kant-Centre NRW</a>&nbsp\;is pleased to invite you to a lecture by Stefano Bacin (Universit&agrave\; degli Studi di Milano) with the following topic:&nbsp\;<strong>The Inescapability of What? Kant&rsquo\;s New Take on Constitutivism.</strong>\n\n<p>The lecture will take place online (via Webex) on Wednesday\, 26 March 2025\, from 18:00 &ndash\; 19:30 CET. The lecture will be held in English.</p>\n<p>Please see below for the Webex-link and an abstract of the lecture.&nbsp\;</p>\n<p>The talk is part of the lecture series Digital Kant-Lectures\, organized by Digital Kant-Centre NRW\, which takes place on the last Wednesday of each month via Webex. For the program of the series\, please see&nbsp\;<a target="_blank">here</a>.</p>\n<p>To stay informed about the activities of Digital Kant-Centre\, please subscribe&nbsp\;<a target="_blank">here</a>&nbsp\;to our newsletter.</p>\n\n<p><strong>Webex-Link:&nbsp\;</strong></p>\n<p><a target="_blank">https://uni-siegen.webex.com/uni-siegen/j.php?MTID=m41000e99082f65f93449c5acd39abaf2</a></p>\n<p><strong>Abstract:&nbsp\;</strong></p>\n<p>It is disputed whether Kant&rsquo\;s approach to moral philosophy and metanormative theory in general can be characterised as a form of constitutivism. To shed light on the issue\, I contrast Kant&rsquo\;s view on the foundations of morality with other eighteenth-century views that can be construed as early variants of constitutivism\, that is\, Reid&rsquo\;s and Butler&rsquo\;s. Drawing on the contrast with those accounts\, I shall suggest that Kant&rsquo\;s view is not to be interpreted in terms of Agency Constitutivism nor as Reason Constitutivism\, but can nevertheless be properly understood as a version of constitutivism. His strategy revolves around a different Inescapability argument\, which grounds on the practice of moral judgment.</p>\n
ORGANIZER;CN=Larissa Berger:
METHOD:PUBLISH
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR