BEGIN:VCALENDAR
PRODID:-//Grails iCalendar plugin//NONSGML Grails iCalendar plugin//EN
VERSION:2.0
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20260406T001421Z
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Prague:20250617T140000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Prague:20250617T170000
SUMMARY:Workshop Historical Contingency
UID:20260406T073718Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-f5d4878dd-4s97k
TZID:Europe/Prague
LOCATION:Bráfova 3\, Ostrava\, Czech Republic
DESCRIPTION:<p><strong>Workshop Historical Contingency</strong></p>\n<p>17.06.2025</p>\n<p>14-17h</p>\n<p>S-Zone (University Library Building\, Br&aacute\;fova 3\, 701 03 Ostrava)/Zoom</p>\n<p>University of Ostrava</p>\n<p>On June 17\, the Centre for the Philosophy of Historiography will organize the workshop &ldquo\;Historical Contingency&rdquo\;. It consists of two consecutive talks with attendant discussions and will be hybrid in format. If you would like to participate in person or on Zoom\, please register with Georg Gangl (<a href="mailto:georg.gangl@osu.cz">georg.gangl@osu.cz</a>). (The registration of in-person participants is for catering purposes only.) For a more detailed programme\, please see below.</p>\n<p><strong>Programme</strong></p>\n<p>14.00-15.30: From Cleopatra&rsquo\;s Nose to Darwin&rsquo\;s Nose: J. B. Bury on History\, Science and Contingency (Gregory Radick\, University of Leeds\, UK)</p>\n<p>"The nose of Cleopatra: had it been shorter\, the face of the entire world would have been changed." Pascal's line\, from his Pens&eacute\;es\, centuries later went on to furnish the title for a famous 1916 essay by the Cambridge historian John Bagnell Bury (1861-1917) highlighting the role of contingency in history.&nbsp\; What\, exactly\, was Bury arguing for\, in that essay as well as in an earlier companion piece\, "Darwinism in History" (1909)?&nbsp\; Why did the theme of contingency in historical science and scientific history come to preoccupy him as it did in these years?&nbsp\;&nbsp\; And what\, now\, should we make of one of his most startling claims in his 1916 essay: that\, over the longue dur&eacute\;e\, contingency has become less important - and that its importance will continue to diminish?&nbsp\; In this talk I'll offer some preliminary answers to these questions as well as more general reflections on Bury's stance on the role of accident in history and its enduring value\, especially for historians of science.</p>\n<p>15.30-17.00: Historical inevitability (Robert Northcott\, Birkbeck University of London\, UK)</p>\n<p>&nbsp\;&ldquo\;World War One was inevitable.&rdquo\; &ldquo\;The course of human history is always contingent.&rdquo\; What sense can we make of such claims? And so\, what evidence could bear on them? I use recent work in philosophy of science to define historical inevitability in terms of causal sensitivity. This implies that it must be understood in a relativized way\, and that it is a property of historical explanations rather than of history itself. I explore how historical inevitability\, so understood\, relates to chance and determinism\, how it relates to predictability\, and how the concept can be used by historians\, social scientists\, and others.</p>
ORGANIZER;CN=Georg Gangl;CN="David Černín";CN=Aviezer Tucker:
METHOD:PUBLISH
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR