BEGIN:VCALENDAR
PRODID:-//Grails iCalendar plugin//NONSGML Grails iCalendar plugin//EN
VERSION:2.0
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20260425T024937Z
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Bucharest:20250927T090000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Bucharest:20250927T090000
SUMMARY:Enactive approaches to LLM and human interaction
UID:20260426T123942Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-6b96c54f56-bljdq
TZID:Europe/Bucharest
LOCATION:University of Bucharest\, Faculty of Philosophy\, Bucharest\, Romania
DESCRIPTION:<p>We encourage MA students\, as well as early PhD's and postdocs\, to contribute research abstracts related to the event's topic areas. Abstracts should be written in English and should not exceed 300 words. Abstracts will receive full consideration if sent before <strong>September 27th\, 2025</strong> at the following address: ubphilosophymasters@gmail.com</p>\n<p>We welcome papers that address (but are not limited to) the following issues:</p>\n<p>Can large language models (LLMs) be genuine participants in social cognition?</p>\n<p>&middot\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\; What misleads us into thinking they might be (claims such as &ldquo\;LLMs have developed theory of mind&rdquo\;\, &ldquo\;LLMs have more empathy than human agents&rdquo\;)?</p>\n<p>&middot\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\; Is it that anthropomorphism and distinguishing social interaction from social cognition are the wrong framework? Are LLMs linguistic agents? If not\, what are they\, models &ndash\; and of what?</p>\n<p>&middot\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\; What does &ldquo\;talking&rdquo\; to a LLM mean?&nbsp\; What are the text outputs of LLMs?</p>\n<p>&middot\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\; Is there any shared ground between LLMs and their human interlocutors? Do such textual encounters realize &ldquo\;narrative practices&rdquo\;? Or does narration\, just like talking\, change meaning and apply more broadly with the emergence of artificial text production?</p>\n<p>&middot\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\; What are the costs and benefits of assuming LLMs are linguistic agents? How does this bear on &ldquo\;therapy&rdquo\; bots\, and why could the &ldquo\;interaction&rdquo\; between a LLM and a person (not) be considered &ldquo\;therapy&rdquo\;? Do LLMS &ldquo\;care&rdquo\;\,&nbsp\;and&nbsp\;need&nbsp\;they?</p>\n<p>All submissions will go through a process of blind peer review. (Please write your identifying details in the body of the email\, and leave the attached abstract anonymized.)</p>\n<p>We intend notifications of acceptance for the abstracts to be sent <strong>out on or before September 30th\, 2025. </strong>The conference programme will be announced as soon as review is completed. For any questions\, please don't hesitate to email: ubphilosophymasters@gmail.com<strong></strong></p>
ORGANIZER;CN=Sandra-Catalina Branzaru;CN="Andrei Mărăşoiu":
METHOD:PUBLISH
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR