BEGIN:VCALENDAR
PRODID:-//Grails iCalendar plugin//NONSGML Grails iCalendar plugin//EN
VERSION:2.0
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20260406T123547Z
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20260610T090000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20260612T170000
SUMMARY:Fiction and Lies: the ASIFF/SIRFF Fourth International Congress
UID:20260406T170831Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-f5d4878dd-r5qzs
TZID:Europe/London
LOCATION:Edinburgh\, United Kingdom
DESCRIPTION:<p>KEYNOTE SPEAKERS<br>-Professor Eileen John (Philosophy\, University of Warwick)<br>--Professor Pierre Bayard (Literature\, Universit&eacute\; Paris 8 - Saint-Denis)</p>\n<p><br>From Plato&rsquo\;s indictment of the tragic poets as misrepresenting the truth\, to Sir Philip Sidney&rsquo\;s famous claim in the Defence of Poesy that &lsquo\;the Poet\, he nothing affirms\, and therefore never lieth&rsquo\;\, to current debates about fictionality and factuality\, the relationship between&nbsp\;fiction&nbsp\;and&nbsp\;lies&nbsp\;has been a focus of scholarly attention. Both&nbsp\;fiction-makers and liars make things up and misrepresent the truth. But it is traditionally assumed that with&nbsp\;fiction\, the invention is non-deceptive. As Margaret Macdonald (1954\, 170) put the point\, &lsquo\;The conviction induced by a story is the result of a mutual conspiracy\, freely entered into\, between author and audience. A storyteller does not&nbsp\;lie\, nor is a normal auditor deceived&rsquo\;. Macdonald proposed that instead\,&nbsp\;fiction-makers engage in a non-deceptive pretence of assertion\; but other approaches also distinguish between fictionality and deception\, from philosophers who associate&nbsp\;fiction&nbsp\;with an invitation to make-believe rather than to believe to narratologists who treat fictionality as a rhetorical mode of communication that overtly signals fabrication. If&nbsp\;lies&nbsp\;are assertions aimed at deception\, perhaps&nbsp\;fictions&nbsp\;are incapable of&nbsp\;lying.<br><br>Yet a sharp distinction between fictionality and deception confronts numerous challenges. Scholars across disciplines have considered the many ways in which&nbsp\;fictions&nbsp\;can affect our beliefs\, for good or ill. Even if&nbsp\;fictions&nbsp\;cannot&nbsp\;lie&nbsp\;in some technical sense\, they can certainly mislead\, insinuate\, obfuscate and so on. Works of&nbsp\;fiction&nbsp\;may be instances of propaganda which misrepresent the facts\; think of Oliver Stone&rsquo\;s film JFK (1991) or Michael Crichton&rsquo\;s&nbsp\;novel&nbsp\;State of Fear (2004). And the distinctions between the&nbsp\;fictional&nbsp\;and factual are under increasing pressure in the current culture of disinformation and &lsquo\;fake news&rsquo\; &ndash\; a category not so easy to distinguish from &lsquo\;fictional&nbsp\;news&rsquo\;.<br><br>This three-day international conference aims to explore the relationship between&nbsp\;fiction&nbsp\;and&nbsp\;lies&nbsp\;from a range of disciplinary and interdisciplinary perspectives\, including philosophy\, literary history and theory\, narratology\, film and media studies\, psychology and cognitive science.&nbsp\;</p>
ORGANIZER;CN=Stacie Friend:
METHOD:PUBLISH
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR
