BEGIN:VCALENDAR
PRODID:-//Grails iCalendar plugin//NONSGML Grails iCalendar plugin//EN
VERSION:2.0
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20260403T225720Z
DTSTART;TZID=America/Chicago:20260305T180000
DTEND;TZID=America/Chicago:20260307T170000
SUMMARY:New School For Social Research: 2026 Philosophy Graduate Student Conference
UID:20260404T003727Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-f5d4878dd-4s97k
TZID:America/Chicago
LOCATION:6 16th St\, New York\, United States\, 10003
DESCRIPTION:<p>Please direct all inquiries to</p>\n<p>New School For Social Research</p>\n<p>2026 Philosophy Graduate Student Conference</p>\n<p>March: 5-7\, 2026</p>\n<p>Where to Begin?</p>\n<p>Any philosophical investigation can commence only after it has answered this most basic of questions - and yet\, since thinking has always already begun\, no question can be more difficult to locate or to answer. &nbsp\;If we seek to follow Lewis Carroll&rsquo\;s advice and &ldquo\;begin at the beginning&rdquo\;\, we must confront a body of historical\, methodological\, and philosophical problems that are currently reshaping the canon - <em>when did philosophy start? And where? And for whom? &nbsp\;Did it begin at all\, in a linear or other structural sense?</em> &nbsp\;If we wish to trace our own being to its origin\, even more problems emerge - <em>does my being start in language? &nbsp\;What can psychology and psychoanalysis reveal about my own formation? &nbsp\;How is my subjectivity determined by traditions\, ideologies\, worlds I have inherited?</em> &nbsp\;And if we look beyond ourselves to the world itself\, the problems only deepen - &nbsp\;<em>what originary truths must we understand to make sense of the world at all? &nbsp\;What do we learn from creation? &nbsp\;In what sense were we creatures created at all?</em> &nbsp\;The Book of John says the world began with logos\, and Genesis suggests it started with formless void\, while science continues to produce more finely-tuned accounts of the origins of the universe - <em>can we reconcile the philosophical and scientific origins of the cosmos?</em> &nbsp\;Philosophy might follow Aristotle in his search for a first cause\, it might follow Descartes in his <em>First Philosophy</em> of doubt in search of certainty or Nagarjuna in total doubt of absolute certainty\, or it might follow Heidegger who insisted upon &ldquo\;the need to prepare for an other beginning&rdquo\;. &nbsp\;It might flow back to the Upanishads of ancient India\, the Dao of ancient China\, or the pre-Socratics of the ancient Mediterranean - or it might emerge anew every day in our forms of life and our critical engagements with what we have been given. &nbsp\;Beginnings might be sociological\, biological\, epistemological\, cosmological\, ontological - and in any case\, they might presuppose too much.</p>\n<p>The 2026 Philosophy Graduate Conference at the New School of Social Research seeks answers to all these questions\, and more. &nbsp\;In the spirit of Hannah Arendt\, whose philosophy of natality emphasizes &ldquo\;that there be a beginning&rdquo\;\, we are looking for work in any philosophical discipline or tradition that engages critically with a question of origin.</p>
ORGANIZER;CN=Matthew Sherman;CN=Ashton Lyle:
METHOD:PUBLISH
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR
