BEGIN:VCALENDAR
PRODID:-//Grails iCalendar plugin//NONSGML Grails iCalendar plugin//EN
VERSION:2.0
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20260501T102405Z
DTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:20251104T120000
DTEND;TZID=America/New_York:20251104T130000
SUMMARY:LTT: Marta Bielinska - Spacetime Epistemology 
UID:20260504T155416Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-6b96c54f56-bljdq
TZID:America/New_York
LOCATION: University of Pittsburgh\, 4200 Fifth Avenue\, Pittsburgh\, United States\, 15260
DESCRIPTION:<p>The Center for Philosophy of Science at the University of Pittsburgh invites you to join us for our Lunch Time Talk.&nbsp\;Attend in person at 1117 Cathedral of Learning or visit our live stream on YouTube at&nbsp\;<a rel="noopenerdata-cke-saved-href="https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCrRp47ZMXD7NXO3a9Gyh2sg">https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCrRp47ZMXD7NXO3a9Gyh2sg</a>.</p>\n\n<p><strong>LTT:&nbsp\;&nbsp\;<a data-cke-saved-href="https://www.oriel.ox.ac.uk/people/martabielinska/">Marta Bielinska</a></strong></p>\n<p>Tuesday\, November 4th&nbsp\; @ 12:00 pm&nbsp\;-&nbsp\;1:30 pm&nbsp\;EST</p>\n\n<p><strong>Title:&nbsp\;Spacetime Epistemology </strong></p>\n<p><strong>Abstract:&nbsp\;</strong></p>\n<p>In physics\, each spacetime theory presupposes a specific mathematical space used as a spacetime model. For example\, spacetime in general relativity is typically considered a (3+1)-Lorentzian manifold that is Hausdorff\, time-orientable\, and so on. The choice of one such structure over another is usually guided by the dynamics\, that is\, by answering the question: Is the proposed structure sufficiently rich to account for the physical entities and dynamical equations of our theories? But how do we ensure\, for example\, that no surplus structure is postulated? A straightforward answer is: through experiment. However\, how can we test such spacetime structures or properties? What are the limitations of such experiments?</p>\n<p>This puzzle is not new to philosophy. Historically\, the question about the epistemic access to the spacetime structure has been famously raised\, for example\, by Helmholtz (1868\, 1896)\, Reichenbach (1924\, 1928)\, and Poincare? (1902). More recent contributions include those by Gru?nbaum (1973)\, Sklar (1974)\, van Fraassen (1970)\, and Dewar et al. (2022). As the authors of the last article point out\, however\, this debate has been largely neglected in recent decades in favor of metaphysical controversies\, such as the relationism-substantivalism debate.</p>\n<p>In this talk\, I revise spacetime epistemology from an angle of contemporary physics. Crucially\, unlike in the aforementioned discussions on spacetime epistemology which focus either on metrical structure or on dynamical equations\, I extend the question of testing spacetime properties to non-metrical spacetime structures\, such as topology or differentiable structure.</p>\n<p>Therefore\, the aim of this presentation is to examine how to test various properties of spacetime&nbsp\;&nbsp\;at different levels of its structure &ndash\; such as orientability at the topological and metric levels &ndash\; by outlining a systematic overview of such experiments\, focusing on their limitations\, and indicating possible directions for the further development of the epistemology of spacetime.</p>\n<p>This talk will be available online:</p>\n<p>Zoom:&nbsp\;<a data-cke-saved-href="https://pitt.zoom.us/j/92973594019">https://pitt.zoom.us/j/92973594019</a></p>\n<p><br>YouTube:&nbsp\;<a data-cke-saved-href="https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCrRp47ZMXD7NXO3a9Gyh2sg">https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCrRp47ZMXD7NXO3a9Gyh2sg</a></p>
ORGANIZER;CN=Edouard Machery:
METHOD:PUBLISH
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR
