BEGIN:VCALENDAR
PRODID:-//Grails iCalendar plugin//NONSGML Grails iCalendar plugin//EN
VERSION:2.0
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20261001T013814Z
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20140908T050000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20140910T130000
SUMMARY:Multiculturalism and Obligation: Individual\, Group\, Society\, and State
UID:20261006T043832Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@fe80:0:0:0:10f5:e0ff:fe86:30ee%3
TZID:Europe/London
LOCATION:Manchester\, United Kingdom
DESCRIPTION:<p>Multiculturalism and Obligations: Individual\, Group\, Society\, and State.<br> <br> MANCEPT Workshops - September 8/10 2014<br> <br> Convenor: Domenico Melidoro (Center for Ethics and Global Politics\, LUISS<br> University of Rome)<br> <br> The debate on multiculturalism\, independently from its placement within<br> liberalism\, has largely been focused on three main issues: 1) the<br> possibility of recognizing some rights to people in reason of their<br> belonging to some sort of groups\; 2) the nature and the limits of admissible<br> cultural diversity\; 3) the proper attitude of state towards this diversity.<br> A fundamental\, but often neglected or underdeveloped\, issue concerns the<br> nature and the limits of the obligations binding individuals to the other<br> actors involved in the academic and political controversies over<br> multiculturalism: groups\, state\, and society understood as that social space<br> between groups and state.<br> <br> A serious and systematic discussion on the obligations individuals owe to<br> their group\, society\, and state might have significant consequences on how<br> the other multicultural issues have to be faced. For instance\, the strength<br> and the kind of the obligation someone owes to the group to which she<br> belongs might have direct bearings on how we can account for minority rights<br> and for the relationship between individual and the state. The more a group<br> exercise legitimate authority over an individual the more it can constrain<br> individual behaviour and ask for collective rights. From a completely<br> different and less multicultural oriented standpoint\, if one aims at denying<br> any legitimate power to groups\, one could argue that states are the only<br> legitimate political entities that can bind individuals. Finally\, those<br> libertarian or anarchical scholars who object to the legitimacy of the state<br> in favour of the power of the groups have to devote some systematic effort<br> to work out a convincing theory of the obligations binding individuals to<br> groups.<br> <br> Thus\, the connections between traditional multicultural issues and the<br> theory of obligation represents a research field worthy to be explored both<br> from political theorists interested in multiculturalism and from those<br> interested in obligations. A collective work on these questions might enrich<br> both the communities of scholars.<br> <br> Professor John Horton (Keele University) will be the keynote speaker of the<br> workshop.&nbsp\;</p>\n<p><a href="mailto:domenico.melidoro@gmail.com">domenico.melidoro@gmail.com</a> </p>
ORGANIZER:
METHOD:PUBLISH
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR
