BEGIN:VCALENDAR
PRODID:-//Grails iCalendar plugin//NONSGML Grails iCalendar plugin//EN
VERSION:2.0
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20260617T211529Z
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20261030T234500
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20261030T234500
SUMMARY:Medically Assisted Dying for Persons with Mental IIlness: Philosophical\, Ethical\, and Legal Perspectives
UID:20260617T214418Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-bd7db559-gt5qm
TZID:Europe/London
DESCRIPTION:<p><strong>Call for Chapters:<em> Medically Assisted Dying for Persons with Mental IIlness: Philosophical\, Ethical\, and Legal Perspectives</em></strong></p>\n<p><strong><em>&nbsp\;</em>(Edited Volume)</strong></p>\n<p><strong>Planned publisher:</strong> Springer (contract in preparation)<br><strong>Planned series:</strong> <em>The International Library of Bioethics</em><br><strong>Editors:</strong> David Čern&yacute\;\, Tom&aacute\;&scaron\; Doležal\, Adam Doležal (Czech Academy of Sciences)\, Manuel Trachsel (University of Basel)</p>\n<p><strong>Rationale and Scope</strong></p>\n<p>Over the past decades\, debates on euthanasia and physician-assisted dying (PAD) have matured in many respects. Yet one domain remains both conceptually unsettled and practically urgent: <strong>psychiatric euthanasia and PAD for persons with mental disorders</strong>. A small but growing number of jurisdictions&mdash\;most prominently <strong>the Netherlands\, Belgium\, and (more recently) Canada</strong>&mdash\;have opened legal pathways for cases where psychiatric suffering is the primary indication\, provoking intense controversy across psychiatry\, bioethics\, law\, and public policy.</p>\n<p>This edited volume aims to provide a <strong>comprehensive\, systematic\, book-length treatment</strong> of psychiatric euthanasia\, integrating <strong>philosophical analysis\, normative bioethics\, comparative law\, and clinical/empirical perspectives</strong>. We welcome contributions that are philosophically rigorous and normatively ambitious while carefully engaging with clinical and legal realities.</p>\n<p>What we are looking for</p>\n<p>We invite proposals for <strong>original chapters</strong> offering:</p>\n<ul>\n<li>\n<p>rigorous argumentation and conceptual clarity\,</p>\n</li>\n<li>\n<p>careful engagement with clinical and legal realities\,</p>\n</li>\n<li>\n<p>empirical grounding where relevant\,</p>\n</li>\n<li>\n<p>an interdisciplinary orientation (chapters may be philosophical\, bioethical\, legal\, psychiatric\, or genuinely interdisciplinary)\,</p>\n</li>\n<li>\n<p>accessibility to an international scholarly readership.</p>\n</li>\n</ul>\n<p>The volume is envisaged as a four-part collection&mdash\;moving from conceptual groundwork through normative debates and legal frameworks to clinical practice and lived experience.</p>\n<p>Suggested Topics (non-exhaustive)</p>\n<p><strong>Part I &mdash\; Conceptual and historical foundations</strong></p>\n<ul>\n<li>\n<p>Concepts\, definitions\, and key distinctions (psychiatric vs somatic vs &ldquo\;mixed&rdquo\; cases)</p>\n</li>\n<li>\n<p>History of euthanasia debates in relation to mental illness</p>\n</li>\n<li>\n<p>The nature of mental suffering\; the badness (or possible acceptability) of death</p>\n</li>\n<li>\n<p>Autonomy\, competence\, and decision-making capacity in psychiatric contexts (incl. fluctuating capacity and ambivalence)</p>\n</li>\n</ul>\n<p><strong>Part II &mdash\; Normative arguments and ethical frameworks</strong></p>\n<ul>\n<li>\n<p>&ldquo\;Parity&rdquo\; arguments (and their limits): somatic vs psychiatric indications</p>\n</li>\n<li>\n<p>Beneficence\, non-maleficence\, autonomy\, justice in psychiatric euthanasia</p>\n</li>\n<li>\n<p>Vulnerability\, coercion\, and structural injustice (stigma\, poverty\, loneliness\, access to care)</p>\n</li>\n<li>\n<p>Slippery-slope arguments\, expressivist concerns\, and symbolic meanings</p>\n</li>\n</ul>\n<p><strong>Part III &mdash\; Legal frameworks and comparative law</strong></p>\n<ul>\n<li>\n<p>The Netherlands: statutory framework\, guidelines\, review practice</p>\n</li>\n<li>\n<p>Belgium: regulation\, case law\, oversight bodies and landmark cases</p>\n</li>\n<li>\n<p>Canada: MAiD and the contested expansion to mental disorders</p>\n</li>\n<li>\n<p>Comparative and human-rights perspectives\; emerging jurisdictions and models of professional self-regulation</p>\n</li>\n</ul>\n<p><strong>Part IV &mdash\; Clinical practice\, empirical evidence\, lived experience</strong></p>\n<ul>\n<li>\n<p>Treatment resistance\, prognosis\, and &ldquo\;irremediability&rdquo\;: epistemic limits in psychiatry</p>\n</li>\n<li>\n<p>Assessing voluntariness and stability of the wish to die\; distinguishing suicidality-as-symptom from a sustained request</p>\n</li>\n<li>\n<p>Empirical studies: patient profiles\, clinician and review-body reasoning\, procedural experiences</p>\n</li>\n<li>\n<p>Suicide prevention\, palliative psychiatry\, recovery-oriented care\, and &ldquo\;reasonable alternatives&rdquo\;</p>\n</li>\n<li>\n<p>Future directions: research priorities\, policy implications\, professional guidance</p>\n</li>\n</ul>\n<p><strong>Volume profile and review process</strong></p>\n<p>The book is planned for Springer&rsquo\;s <em>International Library of Bioethics</em> (contract in preparation). We anticipate <strong>approximately 16&ndash\;17 chapters</strong> (including an overall introduction and concluding chapter). All chapters will undergo <strong>peer review</strong> through an editor-coordinated review process.</p>\n<p><strong>Submission guidelines</strong></p>\n<p>Please submit an <strong>abstract</strong> including:</p>\n<ul>\n<li>\n<p>provisional title</p>\n</li>\n<li>\n<p>abstract (recommended <strong>400&ndash\;800 words</strong>)</p>\n</li>\n<li>\n<p><strong>4&ndash\;6 keywords</strong></p>\n</li>\n<li>\n<p>short author bio (<strong>100&ndash\;150 words</strong>)</p>\n</li>\n</ul>\n<p>Full chapters should be original\, written in English\, and prepared to align with Springer&rsquo\;s book-manuscript requirements.</p>\n<p><strong>Timeline</strong></p>\n<ul>\n<li>\n<p><strong>Extended abstracts due:</strong> 28 February 2026</p>\n</li>\n<li>\n<p><strong>Full chapters due:</strong> 30 October 2026</p>\n</li>\n<li>\n<p><strong>Final manuscript submission to Springer:</strong> 30 December 2026</p>\n</li>\n</ul>\n<p><strong>How to submit</strong></p>\n<p>Please send your abstract (single PDF or DOCX) with the subject line:<br><strong>&ldquo\;Psychiatric Euthanasia &ndash\; Chapter Proposal&rdquo\;&nbsp\;</strong>to: <strong>David Čern&yacute\;</strong> (david.cerny@ilaw.cas.cz)</p>\n
ORGANIZER:
METHOD:PUBLISH
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR
