BEGIN:VCALENDAR
PRODID:-//Grails iCalendar plugin//NONSGML Grails iCalendar plugin//EN
VERSION:2.0
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20260405T143718Z
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20260512T080000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20260512T080000
SUMMARY:MANCEPT Workshop on Theories of Public Reason
UID:20260405T222505Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-f5d4878dd-4s97k
TZID:Europe/London
LOCATION:Manchester\, United Kingdom
DESCRIPTION:<p><strong>Theories of Public Reason</strong></p>\n<p><strong>Panel at the 2026 MANCEPT Workshops in Political Theory\, 2-4 September 2026&nbsp\;</strong></p>\n<p>This panel seeks to bring together those working on issues related to public reason\, broadly conceived. Public reason is an influential framework for understanding how liberal democracies can make fair decisions for diverse citizenries. There is now an extensive literature around public reason: alongside John Rawls&rsquo\;s well-known account\, variants of the idea have been developed in the work of Gerald Gaus\, Jonathan Quong\, Andrew Lister\, Kevin Vallier\, Christie Hartley\, Lori Watson\, and others.</p>\n<p>We intend for this panel to have a broad remit within this topic. So\, we invite submissions contributing to any of the classic debates internal to public reason liberalism\, including\, e.g.\, the correct foundations of public reason requirements and the appropriate level of idealisation for public reason&rsquo\;s &lsquo\;justificatory constituency&rsquo\;. Papers on the application of the idea of public reason to the international domain also are welcome. Relatedly\, we are interested in the clash between competing approaches to public reason\, as exemplified by the debates between &lsquo\;consensus&rsquo\; and &lsquo\;convergence&rsquo\; public reason liberals. In addition\, we are open to submissions that are critical of the public reason framework\, for instance\, from liberal perfectionist\, realist\, or agonist perspectives. Moreover\, we would be interested in discussing key issues related to political liberalism\, Rawlsian or otherwise\, that go beyond the role of public reason within it. Possible examples include the nature of legitimacy\, the debate between advocates of &lsquo\;egalitarian&rsquo\; and &lsquo\;neo-classical liberal&rsquo\; political conceptions of justice\, and questions concerning the organisation of families within pluralist societies.</p>\n<p>Like all other MANCEPT workshops this year\, this event will take place in person.</p>\n<p>https://sites.manchester.ac.uk/mancept/mancept-workshops/</p>\n<p>We invite abstracts of around 500 words\, to be sent to <strong>gabriele.badano@york.ac.uk</strong>\,&nbsp\;<strong>neufeld@uwm.edu</strong>\, and<strong> tahzib@usc.edu</strong> by 12 May 2026. </p>
ORGANIZER;CN=Gabriele Badano;CN=Blain Neufeld;CN=Collis Tahzib:
METHOD:PUBLISH
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR