BEGIN:VCALENDAR
PRODID:-//Grails iCalendar plugin//NONSGML Grails iCalendar plugin//EN
VERSION:2.0
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20260414T115518Z
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20260305T113000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20260305T123000
SUMMARY:Posting and Reposting - Investigating Reputation\, Trust\, and and Deniability in Online Communication
UID:20260421T172533Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-f5d4878dd-dnjxp
TZID:Europe/London
DESCRIPTION:<p>Zoom link:&nbsp\;https://uottawa-ca.zoom.us/j/93124375761<br><br>On social media\, much of what we communicate is affirmed only indirectly\, by reposting (Liu et al. 2014). Reposting\, in turn\, has been identified as one of the main online conduits for fake news (Vosoughi\, Roy\, and Aral 2018). Some researchers have suggested that reposting fosters misinformation because it is governed by more permissive norms (Rini 2017) &ndash\;&nbsp\;<em>reposting</em>&nbsp\;false content is intuitively less damaging to one&rsquo\;s reputation than&nbsp\;<em>directly</em>&nbsp\;<em>posting</em>&nbsp\;that same content. While fairly intuitive\, this hypothesis has never been tested empirically. We present results from four studies that investigate these assumptions\, comparing direct and indirect communication of false information\, both online (posting vs reposting) and offline (claiming vs reporting). Our findings are among the first to examine how reposting affects deniability\, reputation\, and trust\, offering insights into whether this form of communication really can help unreliable communicators to evade the normative incentives that keep misinformation in check.</p>
ORGANIZER;CN="Étienne Brown":
METHOD:PUBLISH
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR
