BEGIN:VCALENDAR
PRODID:-//Grails iCalendar plugin//NONSGML Grails iCalendar plugin//EN
VERSION:2.0
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20260405T185528Z
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Prague:20260525T090000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Prague:20260526T170000
SUMMARY:New Approaches to Non-Classical Conditionals
UID:20260406T025133Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-f5d4878dd-4s97k
TZID:Europe/Prague
LOCATION:Institute of Philosophy\, Jilská 352\, Staré Město\, Czech Republic
DESCRIPTION:<p>The workshop explores novel approaches to non-classical conditionals\, examining their formal behavior\, inferential roles\, and methodological foundations. Central issues include the evaluation of conditional systems independently of classical background logic\, the relative merits of semantic versus proof-theoretic criteria\, and the role of inferential adequacy in assessing conditional principles. The workshop also considers how different conditional logics interface with explanation\, causation\, and counterfactual reasoning in scientifically relevant formal contexts.</p>\n<p><br></p>\n<p><br></p>\n<p>We welcome contributions addressing (but not limited to) the following questions:</p>\n<ul>\n<li>\n<p>Do conditionals have a single core inferential function\, or are they fundamentally context-sensitive operators?</p>\n</li>\n<li>\n<p>How should conditionals behave in inconsistent or information-poor settings?</p>\n</li>\n<li>\n<p>What methodological standards should guide the evaluation of non-classical conditionals:</p>\n</li>\n<li>\n<p>semantic intuitions\, proof-theoretic virtues\, inferential roles\, or applications in science?</p>\n</li>\n<li>\n<p>Can disputes about conditionals be resolved without presupposing classical background logic?</p>\n</li>\n<li>\n<p>How do conditionals interact with explanation\, causation\, and counterfactual reasoning in real scientific practice?</p>\n</li>\n</ul>
ORGANIZER;CN=Vit Puncochar;CN="María del Rosario Martínez-Ordaz":
METHOD:PUBLISH
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR