BEGIN:VCALENDAR
PRODID:-//Grails iCalendar plugin//NONSGML Grails iCalendar plugin//EN
VERSION:2.0
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20260930T070610Z
DTSTART;TZID=America/Montreal:20140724T050000
DTEND;TZID=America/Montreal:20140724T130000
SUMMARY:Justice and Punishment: Exploring Chasms and Connections
UID:20261003T180721Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@fe80:0:0:0:10f5:e0ff:fe86:30ee%3
TZID:America/Montreal
LOCATION:Palais des Congrès\, Montréal\, Canada
DESCRIPTION:<p>Justice and Punishment: Exploring Chasms and Connections</p>\n<p>RC31 Political Philosophy\, IPSA World Congress\, July 24\, 1pm\, Montreal\, Canada\, Palais des Congr&egrave\;s\, Room 513a</p>\n\n<p>Contemporary theories of punishment and theories of justice largely belong to two distinct academic sub-fields. Apart from some notable exceptions\, few theorists of punishment&nbsp\;ever address the question of justice systematically and most theorists of justice concentrate exclusively on matters of distributive justice\, thus leaving penal coercion to one side. This scholarly divide is unsatisfactory for a variety of reasons. Most particularly\, it fails to capture some of the most salient aspects of the practice of state punishment. We&nbsp\;currently speak of courts of justice\, justice departments and&nbsp\;about the correctional justice system. Moreover\, claims or complaints about&nbsp\;the criminal justice system are often expressed&nbsp\;in terms of justice and injustice\, while the normative&nbsp\;import of these allegations remains relatively indistinct.&nbsp\;</p>\n<p>Different conceptions of justice are in contention:&nbsp\;retributive\, restorative\, distributive\, corrective\, procedural\, and so on. Moreover\, different legal traditions point to&nbsp\;potentially incompatible means of legitimating punishment. There is need to reflect anew on possible ways of justly grounding state punishment. Contributions to this panel will raise two key questions.&nbsp\;First\, how apt is it to think&nbsp\;about punishment in terms of justice at all?&nbsp\;Second\, how great a&nbsp\;match or mismatch&nbsp\;is&nbsp\;there&nbsp\;between broad concepts of justice and justifiable or objectionable forms of punishment?</p>\n\n<p>convenor/chair</p>\n<p>andrei poama (sciences po)</p>\n\n<p>speakers</p>\n<p>allan beever (university of south australia): </p>\n<p><em>crime and commutative justice</em><em></em></p>\n<p>vincent chiao (university of toronto): </p>\n<p><em>two conceptions of the criminal law</em><em></em></p>\n<p>ambrose lee (oxford university): </p>\n<p><em>what do the punishments that offenders are said to deserve have anything to do with justice?</em></p>\n<p>matt matravers (university of york): </p>\n<p><em>justice and punishment revisited</em><em></em></p>\n<p>tommie shelby (harvard university): </p>\n<p><em>punishment\, condemnation and social Injustice</em><em></em></p>\n<p><em>&nbsp\;</em></p>\n\n<br>\n-- <br>\nAndrei Poama\nPhD Candidate\, Political Theory\nEcole Doctorale\, Sciences Po\nCERI-CNRS\n<a target="_blank">andrei.poama@sciencespo.fr</a>&nbsp\;\n(0033)664 164 067\n\n\n
ORGANIZER:
METHOD:PUBLISH
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR
