BEGIN:VCALENDAR
PRODID:-//Grails iCalendar plugin//NONSGML Grails iCalendar plugin//EN
VERSION:2.0
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20260519T044224Z
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Madrid:20260610T090000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Madrid:20260611T170000
SUMMARY:The Nature of Logical Assessment
UID:20260605T192752Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-6b96c54f56-bljdq
TZID:Europe/Madrid
LOCATION:Praza de Mazarelos\, Santiago de Compostela\, Spain\, 15782
DESCRIPTION:<p>The Nature of Logical Assessment</p>\n<p>Workshop | Santiago de Compostela\, 10&ndash\;11 June 2026</p>\n\n<p>Submission deadline: 23 April 2026</p>\n\n<p>This workshop explores logical discourse as evaluative discourse\, focusing on how different conceptions of evaluation shape debates about logical disagreement and the status of competing logics. The starting point is the observation that logical claims about validity\, consequence\, and proof appear evaluative\, yet logic also plays a constitutive role in reasoning itself. This tension gives rise to the problem of adoption: any attempt to justify\, revise\, or compare logical norms seems to presuppose some logical norms already in place.</p>\n\n<p>The workshop will examine how this problem constrains approaches to logic and attempts to capture logical normativity\, and will also shed new light on the longstanding debate about which logic is the correct one &mdash\; engaging monism\, pluralism\, and nihilism through the lens of evaluative discourse. Special attention will be given to logical disagreement\, and to how the term "logic" itself is understood across different contexts.</p>\n\n<p>The workshop aims to:</p>\n<p>&mdash\; Clarify what it means to evaluate logically\, distinguishing logical evaluation from other forms of normative assessment</p>\n<p>&mdash\; Illuminate the structure of logical disagreement (propositional\, metatheoretical\, etc.)</p>\n<p>&mdash\; Assess whether logical evaluation can be perspective-dependent without undermining objectivity</p>\n<p>&mdash\; Advance the debate over monism\, pluralism\, and nihilism by showing how attention to evaluation transforms these traditional questions</p>\n\n<p>Invited Speakers:</p>\n<p>&bull\; Frederik J. Andersen (University of Copenhagen)</p>\n<p>&bull\; Anandi Hattiangadi (Stockholm University)</p>\n<p>&bull\; Ole Hjortland (University of Bergen)</p>\n<p>&bull\; Gillian Russell (Australian National University &amp\; University of St Andrews)</p>\n\n<p>Submissions:</p>\n<p>We welcome submissions for contributed talks. Abstracts of up to 1\,000 words should be submitted to: mconcepcion.martinez@usc.es</p>\n\n<p>Important Dates:</p>\n<p>&bull\; Submission deadline: 23 April 2026</p>\n<p>&bull\; Notification of acceptance: 8 May&nbsp\;2026</p>\n\n<p>Organised by Eduardo P&eacute\;rez Navarro\, Dolores Garc&iacute\;a-Arnaldos and Concha Mart&iacute\;nez-Vidal (Episteme Research Group\, Dpto. de Filosof&iacute\;a y Antropolog&iacute\;a\, Facultad de Filosof&iacute\;a\, Universidad de Santiago de Compostela)</p>\n\n<p>Funded by the I+D+I project PID2024-156329NA-100 "The Varieties of Evaluation: Ineliminability of Perspective in Morality\, Logic\, and Science"\, funded by MICIU/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 and by ERDF\, EU.</p>\n\n\n
ORGANIZER;CN="Eduardo Pérez-Navarro";CN=Alba Moreno Zurita;CN="M. Dolores García-Arnaldos";CN="Concha Martínez-Vidal":
METHOD:PUBLISH
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR