BEGIN:VCALENDAR
PRODID:-//Grails iCalendar plugin//NONSGML Grails iCalendar plugin//EN
VERSION:2.0
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20260519T113813Z
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20260526T234500
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20260526T234500
SUMMARY:Objectivity and Subjectivity in Medicine
UID:20260611T151641Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-6b96c54f56-bljdq
TZID:Europe/London
LOCATION:Schwarzman Centre for the Humanities\, Oxford\, United Kingdom
DESCRIPTION:<p><strong>Abstracts of up to 300 words should be submitted to <u>medhum@torch.ac.uk</u> by Sunday 17th May 2026. Please include a short (2-3 line) bio in your submission.&nbsp\;</strong></p>\n<p>This interdisciplinary workshop invites DPhils and ECRs within the medical humanities to share their ongoing research in a supportive environment. Those who work on topics concerning health\, medicine\, and disease from humanities perspectives are invited to submit abstracts. Discussion will focus on the problems of objectivity and subjectivity in medical research and practice: is there such a thing as an &ldquo\;objective&rdquo\; approach to medicine\, and if not\, should there be?&nbsp\;</p>\n<p>Medical knowledge is always situated and inevitably shaped by forms of uncertainty. We invite contributions that explore the ways in which clinical and scientific practices may reproduce structural biases\, as well as how they engage with key aspects of human experience that resist quantification &ndash\; such as pain\, fatigue\, or emotional distress. In this context\, the increasing use of artificial intelligence raises further questions: does it enhance objectivity\, or simply reinforce pre-existing biases? </p>\n<p>The subjectivity of patients also generates important tensions: lived experiences do not always align with standardized scientific frameworks. We welcome contributions that examine\, for instance\, how such experiences may be oversimplified when translated into medical categories and terminology\, or marginalized when they fail to fit pre-existing classificatory systems. We are also interested in initiatives that seek to incorporate patients&rsquo\; experiences and emotions into medical practice.</p>\n<p>In a context of increasing scepticism toward institutional medical discourse and a turn toward alternative medical practices\, it is worth asking how the ideal of objectivity can be reconciled with the acknowledgment of subjective experience. &nbsp\;</p>\n<p>We welcome submissions from across the humanities\, as well as from other disciplines\, that engage with the following topics:&nbsp\;</p>\n\n<p>-          Philosophical and ethical dimensions of objectivity and subjectivity&nbsp\;</p>\n<p>-          The historical construction of &ldquo\;objectivity&rdquo\; in medicine&nbsp\;</p>\n<p>-          Tensions between scientific norms and lived experiences&nbsp\;</p>\n<p>-          Gender\, race\, and class biases in medical practice and research&nbsp\;</p>\n<p>-          Questions of authority\, uncertainty\, and trust in medicine&nbsp\;</p>\n<p>-          Artificial intelligence and medical knowledge/practice&nbsp\;</p>\n
ORGANIZER;CN=Charlotte Dewarumez:
METHOD:PUBLISH
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR
