BEGIN:VCALENDAR
PRODID:-//Grails iCalendar plugin//NONSGML Grails iCalendar plugin//EN
VERSION:2.0
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20260727T093600Z
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20261001T090000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20261001T090000
SUMMARY:Book: Triadic progression of Artificial Argumentation  
UID:20260727T210724Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@fe80:0:0:0:854:79ff:fe66:5f4%3
TZID:Europe/London
DESCRIPTION:<p><strong><em>Triadic progression of Artificial Argumentation&nbsp\;</em></strong> Edited by Prof. Beth-Anne Schuelke-Leech and Dr. Asma Tajuddin (co-editors) To be published by Windsor Studies in Argumentation We invite papers for an edited volume tentatively titled <em>Triadic progression of Artificial Argumentation. </em>The volume will examine three main themes: formal logic\, informal logic and human-centric approaches. It aims to bring together researchers from argumentation theory\, artificial intelligence\, explainable AI\, AI ethics\, AI governance\, philosophical traditions\, law\, and related disciplines to explore the emergence of artificial argumentation and future research.&nbsp\; <strong>Submission Guidelines</strong>Authors must adhere to the following requirements for their manuscripts:</p>\n<ul>\n<li>Deadline for full paper submission: 1 October 2026</li>\n<li>Word count: 4\,000&ndash\;8\,000 words</li>\n<li>Format: Submissions must be in Word format.</li>\n<li>Originality: All submissions must be previously unpublished and not under consideration elsewhere.</li>\n</ul>\n<p>Please submit your papers to the email addresses: tajuddi@uwindsor.ca or Beth-Anne.Schuelke-Leech@uwindsor.ca. The book will be published in 2027 (first quarter or before summer).</p>\n<p>This book aims to capture the triadic progression of artificial argumentation by focusing on three main themes. We have summarised the topics below\, but you are free to suggest those that seem fit.&nbsp\;</p>\n<p>1. Formalisms</p>\n<p>&bull\; Logic-based construction</p>\n<p>&bull\; Rule-based systems</p>\n<p>&bull\; Abstract argumentation frameworks</p>\n<p>&bull\; Semantics: distinction between qualitative acceptance and quantitative assessment&nbsp\;</p>\n<p>methods</p>\n<p>&bull\; Qualitative analysis of arguments</p>\n<p>&bull\; Normative and descriptive analysis</p>\n<p>&bull\; Norm-based protocols</p>\n<p>&bull\; Pragma dialectics</p>\n<p>2. Informalisms</p>\n<p>&bull\; Dialogue Theory</p>\n<p>&bull\; Speech Acts</p>\n<p>&bull\; Argumentation Schemes</p>\n<p>&bull\; Protocols and moves</p>\n<p>&bull\; Preference rankings</p>\n<p>&bull\; Argument relations</p>\n<p>&bull\; Audience-centric Models</p>\n<p>&bull\; Rhetorical analysis</p>\n<p>&bull\; Multi-agent systems</p>\n<p>&bull\; Scheme analysis</p>\n<p>&bull\; Presumptive reasoning</p>\n<p>&bull\; Practical reasoning</p>\n<p>&bull\; Goal-oriented agents</p>\n<p>&bull\; Scheme-based rebuttals</p>\n<p>&bull\; Dialogue games</p>\n<p>&bull\; Virtuous argumentation</p>\n<p>3. Human-centric approaches</p>\n<p>&bull\; Value-guided argumentation models</p>\n<p>&bull\; AI Ethics</p>\n<p>&bull\; AI Governance</p>\n<p>&bull\; Based on human-centric philosophical traditions (for e.g.\, Boston Personalism\,&nbsp\;</p>\n<p>Chicago\, Pittsburgh\, Harvard\, etc)</p>\n<p>&bull\; Debating technologies</p>\n<p>&bull\; Artificial arguers</p>\n<p>&bull\; Designing virtuous agents</p>\n<p>&bull\; Legal reasoning</p>\n<p>&bull\; Medical decision-support</p>
ORGANIZER:
METHOD:PUBLISH
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR