BEGIN:VCALENDAR
PRODID:-//Grails iCalendar plugin//NONSGML Grails iCalendar plugin//EN
VERSION:2.0
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20260917T171558Z
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20260924T163000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20260924T180000
SUMMARY:Online Inner Speech Colloquium - Keith Frankish
UID:20260917T172419Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@fe80:0:0:0:74bb:64ff:feff:71eb%3
TZID:Europe/London
DESCRIPTION:<p>We are excited to have Keith Frankish&nbsp\;(University of Sheffield)&nbsp\;as our speaker at our Online Inner Speech Colloquium. He will be giving a talk titled: "Who is thinking?". Further information and the abstract can be found below.</p>\n<p>Date &amp\; Time: 24-09-26\, 16:30-18:00 CEST</p>\n<p>Link:&nbsp\;https://teams.microsoft.com/meet/345014069399153?p=RWDfS3OrNuOdEmFgGE</p>\n<p><em>Abstract</em></p>\n<p>Conscious reasoning\, I have argued\, is an intentional activity rooted in the self-directed use of language. Through inner speech\, we question\, prompt\, and commit ourselves\, constructing a virtual reasoning system &mdash\; a &lsquo\;supermind&rsquo\; &mdash\; which extends our reasoning capacities far beyond our biological inheritance. Conversations with large language models (LLMs) could extend this empowerment further. They have a strikingly similar structure to inner speech-based reasoning &mdash\; the user externalizes a problem\, receives a response that reframes it\, and iterates towards a conclusion &mdash\; and they could dramatically amplify our inferential reach. In this sense\, talking to an LLM may be a new form of thinking: an extended supermind. But there are risks. Our own supermental reasoning is driven by our personal needs\, goals\, and epistemic commitments\, and we are the authors of the conclusions it supports. LLM-enhanced reasoning\, by contrast\, is partly shaped by responses rooted in statistical patterns that have no systematic relationship to the user&rsquo\;s own cognitive economy. And since LLMs are trained to appear cooperative\, users may be seduced into a false sense of intellectual ownership\, endorsing conclusions that feel self-generated but lack genuine grounding in their own needs and values. In this situation\, the question &lsquo\;Who is thinking?&rsquo\; is not just a philosophical puzzle but a pressing practical concern.</p>\n<p>If you would like to subscribe to (or unsubscribe from) the mailing list\, please contact: jonida.kodra@uni-osnabrueck.de.</p>\n<p>We hope to see many of you there!</p>\n<p>Best regards\,</p>\n<p>Jonida Kodra\, Daniel M&uuml\;ller and Mathijs Geurts (University of Osnabr&uuml\;ck and Paris Lodron&nbsp\;University Salzburg)</p>
ORGANIZER;CN=Jonida Kodra;CN="Daniel Lennart Müller";CN=Mathijs Geurts:
METHOD:PUBLISH
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR
