For the broader intellectual community\, reflecting on the current fractious intellectual climate\, the notion of deep disagreement is a fecund concept. What was originally a limit idea for informal logicians\, in Fogelin&rsquo\;s framing\, has become a heuristic and explanatory tool for accounts of civilizational clash\, metaphilosophical skepticism\, political polarization\, and the intellectual malaise of (post)modernity.
\nHere\, we wish to collect the work of leading scholars in argumentation theory\, social epistemology\, and political philosophy on the questions of deep disagreement. The issue returns to the question named in its title: what becomes of the norms of argumentation at the point where argument seems to run out.
\nPossible topics include (but are not limited to):
\nCONTACT: For any questions\, please directly contact the editors:
\nFind further information for submission at the dedicated site at the journal website for the special collection below: \;
\n ORGANIZER: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT END:VCALENDAR