BEGIN:VCALENDAR
PRODID:-//Grails iCalendar plugin//NONSGML Grails iCalendar plugin//EN
VERSION:2.0
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20261015T233127Z
DTSTART;TZID=Australia/Melbourne:20261022T161500
DTEND;TZID=Australia/Melbourne:20261022T181500
SUMMARY:Multiple Artworks as Historical Types
UID:20261015T233127Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@fe80:0:0:0:e8eb:30ff:feda:226%3
TZID:Australia/Melbourne
LOCATION:Arts West\, West Wing\, Melbourne\, Australia
DESCRIPTION:Some artworks are singular\, while others are multiple. Paintings\, drawings and carved sculptures can have only one instance\, while plays\, photographs\, works of music and literature\, etchings and cast sculptures can have many instances. Whatever kinds of things one takes singular artworks to be\, a type ontology of multiple artworks is appealing. Types are genuinely repeatable entities that can be tokened multiple times. However\, the price for this neat way of explaining the repeatability of multiple artworks seems high. If multiple artworks are types\, they cannot have many of the properties that we commonly ascribe to them.&nbsp\;\n&nbsp\;\nMy aim in this paper is to defend a type ontology of multiple artworks against common criticisms. I will argue that multiple artworks are historical types. That is\, the various tokens of a multiple artwork are bound together by their shared causal history.&nbsp\;
ORGANIZER;CN=Jenny Judge:
METHOD:PUBLISH
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR