BEGIN:VCALENDAR
PRODID:-//Grails iCalendar plugin//NONSGML Grails iCalendar plugin//EN
VERSION:2.0
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20261024T011035Z
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20120330T090000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20120330T090000
SUMMARY:Design\, Mediation\, and the Posthuman
UID:20261024T223837Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@fe80:0:0:0:1c5f:82ff:fe15:9f6e%3
TZID:Europe/London
DESCRIPTION:<p>We invite submissions for an edited anthology exploring the&nbsp\;disciplinary intersections of technological mediation\, design\, and the&nbsp\;posthuman.<br><br>Deadline: Abstracts of 500 words should be submitted by March 30\,&nbsp\;2012. Notifications will be made by early May with final drafts of&nbsp\;submissions due by September 30\, 2012.<br><br>Please include a short biographical statement with abstracts.<br><br>Editors:<br><br>Dr. Amy Propen\, Rhetoric and Composition\, York College of Pennsylvania&nbsp\;(<a href="mailto:apropen@ycp.edu">apropen@ycp.edu</a>\;&nbsp\;<a target="_blank">http://amypropen.com/</a>)<br><br>Dr. Colbey Reid\, Literary Studies\, York College of Pennsylvania&nbsp\;(<a href="mailto:creid@ycp.edu">creid@ycp.edu</a>)<br><br>Dr. Dennis Weiss\, Philosophy\, York College of Pennsylvania&nbsp\;(<a href="mailto:dweiss@ycp.edu">dweiss@ycp.edu</a>\,&nbsp\;<a target="_blank">http://faculty.ycp.edu/~dweiss/</a>)<br><br>In the early days of the Internet\, there was much talk about moving&nbsp\;from the offline world to the online world. Fanboys to cybertheorists&nbsp\;proclaimed the demassification of culture. Life\, we were told\, would&nbsp\;become increasingly virtual and the world of things wouldn&rsquo\;t matter&nbsp\;much. In their 1994 preamble to &ldquo\;Cyberspace and the American Dream: A&nbsp\;Magna Carta for the Knowledge Age\,&rdquo\; cyberlibertarians Esther Dyson\,&nbsp\;George Gilder\, and George Keyworth nicely articulated this early&nbsp\;Internet dream: &ldquo\;The central event of the 20th century is the&nbsp\;overthrow of matter. In technology\, economics\, and the politics of&nbsp\;nations\, wealth&mdash\;in the form of physical resources&mdash\;has been losing&nbsp\;value and significance. The powers of mind are everywhere ascendant&nbsp\;over the brute force of things.&rdquo\;<br><br>The past decade\, however\, has witnessed a renewed focus on&nbsp\;materiality. From Bruno Latour&rsquo\;s constitution of a parliament of&nbsp\;things to Jane Bennett&rsquo\;s efforts in Vibrant Matter to challenge the&nbsp\;view of matter as passive and inert\, Johndan Johnson-Eilola&rsquo\;s recent&nbsp\;exploration of the social lives and agency of texts (2010)\, and Bill&nbsp\;Brown&rsquo\;s award-winning 2001 Critical Inquiry issue on &ldquo\;thing theory\,&rdquo\; a&nbsp\;variety of discourses and disciplines have renewed their efforts to&nbsp\;engage questions about the epistemic and rhetorical power of physical&nbsp\;artifacts. Literary theorists\, digital humanists\, rhetoricians\,&nbsp\;philosophers of technology\, and product designers are paying more&nbsp\;attention to the crafted environment\, the manner in which artifacts&nbsp\;mediate human relations\, and the constitution of a world in which the&nbsp\;boundary between humans and things has seemingly imploded.&nbsp\;Simultaneously\, new questions arise about the extent to which we ought&nbsp\;to view humans and nonhuman artifacts as bearing equal capacity for&nbsp\;agency and life\, and the ways in which technological mediation&nbsp\;challenges the central tenets of humanism and anthropocentrism.<br><br>Contemporary theories of human-object relations presage the arrival of&nbsp\;the posthuman\, which is no longer a futuristic or science-fictional&nbsp\;concept but rather one descriptive of the present\, and indeed\, the&nbsp\;past. As Charles Bazerman has observed\, &ldquo\;technology&hellip\; has always been&nbsp\;part of human needs\, desires\, values\, and evaluation\, articulated in&nbsp\;language and at the very heart of rhetoric&rdquo\; (383). Bill Brown&rsquo\;s A&nbsp\;Sense of Things likewise points out that humans have long been living&nbsp\;under what one Atlantic Monthly article positioned\, already in 1906\,&nbsp\;as a tyranny of things. Discussions of the posthuman already have a&nbsp\;long history in fields like literary theory\, rhetoric\, and philosophy\,&nbsp\;and as advances in design and technology result in increasingly&nbsp\;engaging artifacts that mediate more and more aspects of everyday&nbsp\;life\, it becomes necessary to engage in a systematic\,&nbsp\;interdisciplinary\, critical examination of the intersection of the&nbsp\;domains of design\, technological mediation\, and the posthuman.<br><br>Design\, Mediation\, and the Posthuman\, itself a project of mediation&nbsp\;within the complex intersections occasioned by the history of&nbsp\;technology\, aims to bring diverse disciplines together to foster a&nbsp\;dialogue on some of the significant technological issues pertinent to&nbsp\;philosophy\, rhetoric\, aesthetics\, and science.<br><br>Topics may include\, but are not limited to:</p>\n<ul>\n<li>Humanism and anthropocentrism in a world of relational artifacts</li>\n<li>The place of the human being in technologically mediated environments</li>\n<li>Moving from a demassified culture to a culture of things and artifacts</li>\n<li>The resurgence of materiality and things in a posthuman world</li>\n<li>The posthuman at the nexus of design culture and technologies of&nbsp\;mediation</li>\n<li>The value of things in a posthuman device culture (Albert Borgmann and&nbsp\;philosophy of technology)</li>\n<li>The symmetry thesis and the status of the human being</li>\n<li>Multimodal technologies\, rhetorics\, and questions of agency</li>\n<li>Rhetorics of the posthuman and questions of agency</li>\n<li>Rhetorically-focused case studies or ethnographies involving&nbsp\;technologically mediated environments\, spaces\, and bodies</li>\n<li>The text as agent\; texts and agency</li>\n<li>Visual\, material\, and spatial rhetorics\, design\, and mediation</li>\n<li>The posthuman quality of material cultures\, past and present</li>\n<li>Textual design as a space of human-object interface</li>\n<li>Digital archives and the problems\, uses of technologically mediated&nbsp\;history</li>\n<li>Design culture: interior design\, fashion design\, artisanal&nbsp\;craftsmanship and/as human-artifact boundary dissolution</li>\n<li>Form (style\, genre\, etc) as technology\; parallels between the turn to&nbsp\;form and the turn to&nbsp\;things</li>\n<li>Proto-posthumanisms (Victorian\, Edwardian &ldquo\;cyborgs&rdquo\;)</li>\n</ul>\n\n<p>Please submit abstracts of 500 words and a short biographical&nbsp\;statement to Amy Propen (<a href="mailto:apropen@ycp.edu">apropen@ycp.edu</a>) or Colbey Reid&nbsp\;(<a href="mailto:creid@ycp.edu">creid@ycp.edu</a>) or Dennis Weiss (<a href="mailto:dweiss@ycp.edu">dweiss@ycp.edu</a>) by March 30\, 2012.&nbsp\;Essays appearing in the anthology will average 3\,000-6\,000 words. MLA&nbsp\;style should be used where citation is required. Notification of&nbsp\;acceptance will be given by early May. Completed chapters will be due&nbsp\;by September 30\, 2012.</p>\n
ORGANIZER:
METHOD:PUBLISH
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR
