BEGIN:VCALENDAR
PRODID:-//Grails iCalendar plugin//NONSGML Grails iCalendar plugin//EN
VERSION:2.0
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20260502T000417Z
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Zurich:20141023T181500
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Zurich:20141023T194500
SUMMARY:Perceiving Emotions: Liberalism and Cognitive Penetrability
UID:20260506T060801Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-6b96c54f56-bljdq
TZID:Europe/Zurich
LOCATION:Geneva\, Switzerland
DESCRIPTION:<p>Thumos - the genevan research group on emotions\, values and norms</p>\n<p>Swiss National Center for Affective Sciences\, University of Geneva <br>&nbsp\;</p>\n<p>Next Thursday at 4.15 p.m.\, Pepa Toribio (ICREA/Universitat de Barcelona) will present her paper:&nbsp\;<strong>"Perceiving Emotions: Liberalism and Cognitive Penetrability"</strong>&nbsp\;(abstract below).</p>\n<p>We will meet at the Swiss Centre for Affective Sciences\, at the Campus Biotech (9\, Chemin des Mines\, 1202 Geneva\; see directions and map below)\, in the small conference room.&nbsp\;</p>\n<p>Please come at 4 p.m. at the main entrance\, so that we can provide you with a badge to access the building. In case you have trouble finding us\, please call me at 076/561.71.35.</p>\n<p>Attendance is free. All welcome!</p>\n<p>Best wishes\,</p>\n<p>Santiago\, on behalf of Thumos</p>\n<p>*</p>\n<p>Abstract</p>\n<p>According to so-called "rich" or "liberal" views\, we can visually experience high-level properties such as being sad or being angry. By contrast\, according to "sparse" or "conservative" views\, visual experience can only involve low-level features such as colour\, shape\, texture or location. Unsurprisingly\, philosophical arguments on both sides of the debate have failed to settle this issue. In this talk\, I discuss some recent studies in social vision and conclude that data from this branch of vision science help strengthen liberalism. Along the way\, I will tackle a different but related topic\, namely the relationship between the claim that visual experience is rich and the view that it is cognitively penetrable. Despite their logical independence\, both theses tend to go hand in hand in the literature. I will argue that there is\, however\, an interesting and so far overlooked tension: the stronger the evidence in favour of rich views\, the less plausible the cognitive penetrability claim seems to be.</p>\n\n<p><em>How to reach the Swiss Centre for Affective Sciences?</em></p>\n<p>Access from the Cornavin train station</p>\n<p>The closest tram/bus stops are called &ldquo\;<strong>France</strong>&rdquo\; (tram stop) and &ldquo\;<strong>Mines&rdquo\;</strong>&nbsp\;(bus stop). There are two ways to come to the Center from the Cornavin train station.</p>\n<p>1) Take bus 25&nbsp\; or 1 until the stop &ldquo\;Mines&rdquo\; (6th&nbsp\;stop). The bus stops right in front of the main entrance.</p>\n<p>2) Take tram 15&nbsp\; until the stop &ldquo\;France&rdquo\; (3rd&nbsp\;stop)\, walk downhill for about 100 meters (2 minutes)\, towards the lake\, then turn left on "Avenue Blanc". At the end of the street (about 300 meters)\, you will reach the main entrance of the building at 9 chemin des Mines.</p>\n<p>See map on<em>&nbsp\;</em><em>http://www.affective-sciences.org/contact</em><em></em></p>\n<p>You can find more information about our weekly seminar and about Thumos on&nbsp\;http://cms.unige.ch/lettres/philo/wiki/Thumos_Seminar</p>
ORGANIZER:
METHOD:PUBLISH
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR