BEGIN:VCALENDAR
PRODID:-//Grails iCalendar plugin//NONSGML Grails iCalendar plugin//EN
VERSION:2.0
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20260604T213525Z
DTSTART;TZID=Australia/Melbourne:20141024T101500
DTEND;TZID=Australia/Melbourne:20141024T121500
SUMMARY:Do Care robots make an advance on telecare? Presence\, integration and "empathy"
UID:20260606T183515Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-bd7db559-gt5qm
TZID:Australia/Melbourne
LOCATION:Wellington Road\, Clayton\, Australia\, 3800
DESCRIPTION:<p><strong>Biography:</strong> &nbsp\;Professor Tom Sorell is Professor of Politics and Philosophy at the&nbsp\;University of Warwick (UK)\, and Head of the Interdisciplinary Ethics&nbsp\;Research Group there</p>\n<p>(http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/pais/research/ierg/).</p>\n<p>Previously\, he&nbsp\;was John Ferguson Professor of Global Ethics and Director of the Centre&nbsp\;for the Study of Global Ethics\, University of Birmingham. In 1996-7\, he&nbsp\;was Faculty Fellow in Ethics at Harvard. Previously he was Co-Director of&nbsp\;the Human Rights Centre\, University of Essex. He has published widely in&nbsp\;philosophy. In bioethics he has written on consumerism and health care&nbsp\;markets\, insurance\, and\, with Heather Draper\, on patients'&nbsp\;responsibilities\, telehealth\, telecare and care robots. He is a&nbsp\;participant in the European care robotics project ACCOMPANY\, and advises&nbsp\;the robotics projects FROG and EASEL.</p>\n<p><strong>Title:</strong> &nbsp\;Do Care robots make an advance on telecare? Presence\, integration and&nbsp\;"empathy"</p>\n<p><strong>Synopsis:</strong> &nbsp\;In North America\, Western Europe\, South East Asia and elsewhere\, robots&nbsp\;are being designed as home-based care companions to less able but&nbsp\;competent older people. These robots are expensive and relatively&nbsp\;incapable. What\, if anything\, suits them to be care companions? Perhaps&nbsp\;"presence" in a sense to be explained\; perhaps "presence" plus the&nbsp\;integration of functions otherwise requiring many machines\, robotic and&nbsp\;otherwise. Perhaps certain allegedly empathic capacities. I cast doubt on&nbsp\;all of these suggestions\, taking as my example of a care robot the&nbsp\;platform used in the European Commission funded project\, ACCOMPANY&nbsp\;(http://accompanyproject.eu/). I argue for a mix of telecare technology&nbsp\;and very simple robots--far simpler than Care-o-bots. Telecare is in&nbsp\;principle no worse ethically than a care-robot\, is much cheaper and more&nbsp\;adaptable than robots to a wide variety of housing\, and is already in&nbsp\;operation in many countries.&nbsp\; Although telecare is sometimes criticized&nbsp\;as intrusive\, this is usually based on exaggeration.</p>
ORGANIZER:
METHOD:PUBLISH
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR
