Conference
\nHow to think the Anthropocene?
\nAnthropologists\, philosophers and sociologists facing climate change.
\nIn December 2015\, the 2015 United Nations Climate Change Conference\, commonly known as the COP21 (21st Conference of the Parties)\, will take place in Bourget\, near Paris. This conference raises both hopes and fears\, and many think that this meeting is the last chance to cut a deal that might impose greenhouse gas emissions reduction and thus moderate global warming in order to avoid otherwise inevitable catastrophic impacts on the environment. \;
\nClimate change is a global phenomenon par excellence\, given the magnitude of worldwide ecological disruption caused by human activities. This is the main reason why some believe that the planet has left the Holocene and entered a new ecological epoch\, the Anthropocene\, distinguished by the impact of human populations (and of their activities) on geophysical phenomena. However\, this global change is also a heterogeneous phenomenon: not only local populations all over the world are diversely affected depending on its effect on their living environment\, but also their contributions to climate change differ\, as well as their capacity to confront it.
\nDuring the conference\, we will discuss the various aspects of justice in distribution of environmental responsibilities as a response \;to climate change\, in particular in the context of the principle &ldquo\;of shared but differentiated responsibilities&rdquo\; adopted in Rio de Janeiro and debated since then at climate conferences. Local consequences of climate change (sea level rise\, drastic decline or increase of mean precipitation\, melting of glaciers and ice caps\, droughts frequency and intensity\, hurricanes\, forest fires\, etc.) will impact populations with different resilience capacities. Responsibility and justice also presume active solidarity from countries either better adapted or richer\, or both\; therefore\, we have to think about climate migration and its social and cultural consequences.
\nThe Anthropocene hypothesis implies that human and natural history meet\, and this affirms the unification of humanity\, understood as a natural force. What does this unity mean\, if\, at the same time\, we acknowledge that the magnitude of the influence of each human population on the global climate change varies considerably\, and that different populations experience differently its consequences? How should it be understood from an anthropological point of view\, since anthropology tends to insist on diversity of cultures and communities? Moreover\, if nations&rsquo\; search for a common stance makes it necessary to define the general interest\, what are possible bases to determine this unity\, given that this stance has to be not only political but also scientific?
\nWe hope that we will able if not answer all those questions\, at least provide a perfect setting to discuss them in a multidisciplinary context of social and human sciences. \;
\nThe conference is set to feature more than 50 distinguished speakers\, including: \;
\nThe attendance is free\, but please think about registering before coming to the conference: http://www.fondationecolo.org/l-anthropocene/inscriptions \;
ORGANIZER;CN=Philippe Descola;CN="Catherine Larrère": METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT END:VCALENDAR