BEGIN:VCALENDAR
PRODID:-//Grails iCalendar plugin//NONSGML Grails iCalendar plugin//EN
VERSION:2.0
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20260605T071549Z
DTSTART;TZID=Australia/Melbourne:20150304T090000
DTEND;TZID=Australia/Melbourne:20150304T110000
SUMMARY: Recycling the concept of reuse: Why interaction theory is more ecologically friendly than the simulation theory of social cognition.
UID:20260607T122350Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-bd7db559-gt5qm
TZID:Australia/Melbourne
LOCATION:Monash University\, Clayton\, Australia\, 3800
DESCRIPTION:<p>Abstract: Simulation theorists\, like Gallese and Goldman\, appeal to the notion of neural reuse or recycling (Dehaene 2005\; Anderson 2010).&nbsp\; Although the notion of neural reuse provides a good evolutionary story about brain organization\, and specifically about mirror neurons\, it doesn't tell us anything about how simulation works\, or why the simulationist interpretation of mirror neuron processes is correct.&nbsp\; I argue that the neural reuse hypothesis actually supports an enactivist interpretation of mirror neuron processes in the context of social cognition .<br><br></p>
ORGANIZER:
METHOD:PUBLISH
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR