In Antichrist\, section 2\, Nietzsche says the following: &lsquo\;What is good? - All that heightens the feeling of power\, the will to power\, power itself in man&rsquo\;. This importance of this line has been downplayed in the literature as being merely three ways to express one idea\, namely that what is good is power. I argue that it can be helpfully understood as expressing three different power norms\, namely the feeling of power\, will to power\, and power itself. I utilise this reading of A 2 to make sense of Nietzsche&rsquo\;s revaluation of all values\, which doesn&rsquo\;t attribute to Nietzsche some idiosyncratic conception of &lsquo\;good&rsquo\;\, held only by him and like-minded people. Rather\, I argue that Nietzsche has a two-tiered conception of &lsquo\;good&rsquo\;\, where there are (at least) two\, live\, value-standards.
\nDavid Rowe completed his PhD at La Trobe University in 2014. His dissertation constructs a Nietzschean opponent to contemporary analytic metaethics. He has an article in the International Journal of Philosophical Studies\, titled "Nietzsche's 'anti-Naturalism' in 'The Four Great Errors'" (2013).
ORGANIZER;CN=Sean Bowden: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT END:VCALENDAR