BEGIN:VCALENDAR
PRODID:-//Grails iCalendar plugin//NONSGML Grails iCalendar plugin//EN
VERSION:2.0
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20260405T120639Z
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Berlin:20150723T053000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Berlin:20150724T130000
SUMMARY:Epistemic Consequentialism
UID:20260405T194921Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-f5d4878dd-4s97k
TZID:Europe/Berlin
LOCATION:Universitätsstrasse 10\, Konstanz\, Germany
DESCRIPTION:<p>The aim of the workshop is to bring&nbsp\;together epistemologists who focus on epistemic consequentialism. The theme of the workshop is intended to be construed fairly broadly\, and will cover questions such as:</p>\n<ul>\n<li>What is epistemic consequentialism\, and are there different forms of epistemic consequentialism? &nbsp\;</li>\n<li>What is the relation between epistemic consequentialism and consequentialism as understood in ethics? &nbsp\;</li>\n<li>How can epistemic consequentialism be justified? &nbsp\;</li>\n<li>What are epistemic goals/aims? Are there different epistemic aims? If so\, what are they?: truth\, knowledge\, justification\, explanatory&nbsp\;power\, understanding\, etc.? And how are they related? &nbsp\;</li>\n<li>Does the justificatory status of a doxastic state depend on epistemic goals? If so\, in what respect does it depend on them? &nbsp\;</li>\n<li>Does the acceptability of all or only of some epistemic norms depend on epistemic goals? If so\, which norms depend on such goals and&nbsp\;in what respect do they depend on them? &nbsp\;</li>\n<li>Or\, is the acceptability of all epistemic norms independent of epistemic goals?</li>\n</ul>
ORGANIZER;CN=Jochen  Briesen;CN=Anna-Maria A. Eder:
METHOD:PUBLISH
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR